Re: What to do with the nanomips disassembler (was: [PATCH] disas: Remove libvixl disassembler)

2022-07-08 Thread Thomas Huth
On 04/07/2022 14.22, Milica Lazarevic wrote: On 09/06/2022 18.31, Vince Del Vecchio wrote: ... Regardless, I think we can look at converting the existing disassembler from C++ to C.  That would address the current concern, right? > Right - if it's not too much of a hassle that would

What to do with the nanomips disassembler (was: [PATCH] disas: Remove libvixl disassembler)

2022-07-04 Thread Milica Lazarevic
Hi everyone, I am interested in taking on this task. Milica

What to do with the nanomips disassembler (was: [PATCH] disas: Remove libvixl disassembler)

2022-07-04 Thread Milica Lazarevic
FYI: Copying the conversation. On 09/06/2022 18.31, Vince Del Vecchio wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 10:34AM, Thomas Huth wrote: On 09/06/2022 16.15, Claudio Fontana wrote: On 6/9/22 13:27, Claudio Fontana wrote: On 6/9/22 10:57, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at

Re: What to do with the nanomips disassembler (was: [PATCH] disas: Remove libvixl disassembler)

2022-06-09 Thread Thomas Huth
On 09/06/2022 18.31, Vince Del Vecchio wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 10:34AM, Thomas Huth wrote: On 09/06/2022 16.15, Claudio Fontana wrote: On 6/9/22 13:27, Claudio Fontana wrote: On 6/9/22 10:57, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:47:24AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: On

RE: What to do with the nanomips disassembler (was: [PATCH] disas: Remove libvixl disassembler)

2022-06-09 Thread Vince Del Vecchio via
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 10:34AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 09/06/2022 16.15, Claudio Fontana wrote: >> On 6/9/22 13:27, Claudio Fontana wrote: >>> On 6/9/22 10:57, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:47:24AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 08/06/2022 17.51, Paolo Bonzini

What to do with the nanomips disassembler (was: [PATCH] disas: Remove libvixl disassembler)

2022-06-09 Thread Thomas Huth
On 09/06/2022 16.15, Claudio Fontana wrote: On 6/9/22 13:27, Claudio Fontana wrote: On 6/9/22 10:57, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:47:24AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: On 08/06/2022 17.51, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 6/3/22 19:35, Thomas Huth wrote: On 03/06/2022 19.26,