On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:34:32 +0100
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote:
> * Lukas Straub (lukasstra...@web.de) wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 19:16:54 +0200
> > Lukas Straub wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Everyone,
> > > I did some Benchmarking with iperf3 and memtester (to dirty some guest
> > >
* Lukas Straub (lukasstra...@web.de) wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 19:16:54 +0200
> Lukas Straub wrote:
>
> > Hello Everyone,
> > I did some Benchmarking with iperf3 and memtester (to dirty some guest
> > memory)
> > of colo performance in qemu 4.2.0 and in qemu 5.0.0-rc2
> > with my bugfixes on
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 19:16:54 +0200
Lukas Straub wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> I did some Benchmarking with iperf3 and memtester (to dirty some guest memory)
> of colo performance in qemu 4.2.0 and in qemu 5.0.0-rc2
> with my bugfixes on top.(
>
s ram,
so it should be double amount.
Thanks,
Hailiang
-邮件原件-
发件人: Lukas Straub [mailto:lukasstra...@web.de]
发送时间: 2020年4月12日 1:17
收件人: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
抄送: dgilb...@redhat.com; quint...@redhat.com; Zhanghailiang
; Zhang Chen
主题: colo: qemu 4.2.0 vs. qemu 5.0.0-rc2 performance
Hello Everyone,
I did some Benchmarking with iperf3 and memtester (to dirty some guest memory)
of colo performance in qemu 4.2.0 and in qemu 5.0.0-rc2
with my bugfixes on top.(
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-04/msg01432.html )
I have taken the average over 4 runs.
