09.11.2020 18:22, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/9/20 1:17 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
07.11.2020 01:53, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 20:36, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/6/20 11:22 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hi; Coverity's "you usually check the return value of this function
On 11/9/20 1:17 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 07.11.2020 01:53, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 20:36, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/6/20 11:22 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hi; Coverity's "you usually check the return value of this function
but you didn't do that
07.11.2020 01:53, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 20:36, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/6/20 11:22 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hi; Coverity's "you usually check the return value of this function
but you didn't do that here" heuristic has fired on the code in
nbd/server.c:bitmap_to_extents()
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 20:36, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> On 11/6/20 11:22 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Hi; Coverity's "you usually check the return value of this function
> > but you didn't do that here" heuristic has fired on the code in
> > nbd/server.c:bitmap_to_extents() -- the function
On 11/6/20 11:22 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi; Coverity's "you usually check the return value of this function
> but you didn't do that here" heuristic has fired on the code in
> nbd/server.c:bitmap_to_extents() -- the function nbd_extent_array_add()
> is called five times in server.c, and the
Hi; Coverity's "you usually check the return value of this function
but you didn't do that here" heuristic has fired on the code in
nbd/server.c:bitmap_to_extents() -- the function nbd_extent_array_add()
is called five times in server.c, and the return value is checked
in four of those, but not in
