On 3/21/23 17:40, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:43:55PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Here are IRC logs from a discussion that has taken place about this
topic. Summary:
- QEMU has ~$500/month Azure credits available that could be used for CI
- Burstable VMs like Azure
Eldon Stegall writes:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:40:03PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> 3 weeks later... Any progress on getting Red Hat to assign someone to
>> setup Azure for our CI ?
>
> I have the physical machine that we have offered to host for CI set up
> with a recent version of
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:43:55PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Here are IRC logs from a discussion that has taken place about this
> topic. Summary:
> - QEMU has ~$500/month Azure credits available that could be used for CI
> - Burstable VMs like Azure AKS nodes seem like a good strategy in
>
Eldon Stegall writes:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:43:55PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> - Personally, I don't think this should exclude other efforts like
>> Eldon's. We can always add more private runners!
>
> Hi!
> Thanks so much to Alex, Thomas, Gerd, et al for the pointers.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:43:55PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> - Personally, I don't think this should exclude other efforts like
> Eldon's. We can always add more private runners!
Hi!
Thanks so much to Alex, Thomas, Gerd, et al for the pointers.
Although the month has passed and presumably
Here are IRC logs from a discussion that has taken place about this
topic. Summary:
- QEMU has ~$500/month Azure credits available that could be used for CI
- Burstable VMs like Azure AKS nodes seem like a good strategy in
order to minimize hosting costs and parallelize when necessary to keep
CI
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:11:11PM +, Eldon Stegall wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:33:00PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > IIUC, we already have available compute resources from a couple of
> > sources we could put into service. The main issue is someone to
> > actually configure
Eldon Stegall writes:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:33:00PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> IIUC, we already have available compute resources from a couple of
>> sources we could put into service. The main issue is someone to
>> actually configure them to act as runners *and* maintain their
On 2/23/23 16:33, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:28:37PM +, Ben Dooks wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:56:56PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hi; the project is out of gitlab CI pipeline minutes again.
In the absence of any other proposals, no more pull request
merges
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:11:11PM +, Eldon Stegall wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:33:00PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > IIUC, we already have available compute resources from a couple of
> > sources we could put into service. The main issue is someone to
> > actually configure
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:33:00PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> IIUC, we already have available compute resources from a couple of
> sources we could put into service. The main issue is someone to
> actually configure them to act as runners *and* maintain their
> operation indefinitely going
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:28:37PM +, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:56:56PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Hi; the project is out of gitlab CI pipeline minutes again.
> > In the absence of any other proposals, no more pull request
> > merges will
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:56:56PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi; the project is out of gitlab CI pipeline minutes again.
> In the absence of any other proposals, no more pull request
> merges will happen til 1st March...
Is there a way of sponsoring more minutes, could people provi
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 07:15:47AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023, 6:48 AM Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> > On 23/02/2023 13.56, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > Hi; the project is out of gitlab CI pipeline minutes again.
> > > In the absence of any other p
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023, 6:48 AM Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23/02/2023 13.56, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Hi; the project is out of gitlab CI pipeline minutes again.
> > In the absence of any other proposals, no more pull request
> > merges will happen til 1st March...
>
>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 02:46:40PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23/02/2023 13.56, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Hi; the project is out of gitlab CI pipeline minutes again.
> > In the absence of any other proposals, no more pull request
> > merges will happen til 1st March...
>
On 23/02/2023 13.56, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hi; the project is out of gitlab CI pipeline minutes again.
In the absence of any other proposals, no more pull request
merges will happen til 1st March...
I'd like to propose again to send a link along with the pull request that
shows that the shared
Hi; the project is out of gitlab CI pipeline minutes again.
In the absence of any other proposals, no more pull request
merges will happen til 1st March...
-- PMM
18 matches
Mail list logo
