14.08.2023 10:27, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:12:35 +0300
Michael Tokarev wrote:
14.08.2023 10:01, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
I think we could guard the offending item with CONFIG_SOFTMMU for now,
to immediately fix the issues you raised, and do the refactoring you
proposed l
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:12:35 +0300
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 14.08.2023 10:01, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
>
> > I think we could guard the offending item with CONFIG_SOFTMMU for now,
> > to immediately fix the issues you raised, and do the refactoring you
> > proposed later (e.g. next cycle).
>
>
On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 12:48:14 +0300
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 12.08.2023 12:38, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> ...
> > It smells like, at the very least, os-posix.c should be split. We shouldn't
> > include
> > a ton of qemu-system functionality (like very specific option parsing) into
> > qemu-nbd
> >
14.08.2023 10:01, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
I think we could guard the offending item with CONFIG_SOFTMMU for now,
to immediately fix the issues you raised, and do the refactoring you
proposed later (e.g. next cycle).
I don't think rushing for the last-minute fix is necessary in this case.
It ha
12.08.2023 12:38, Michael Tokarev wrote:
...
It smells like, at the very least, os-posix.c should be split. We shouldn't
include
a ton of qemu-system functionality (like very specific option parsing) into
qemu-nbd
for example.
How about splitting os-posix.c into a few files in util/ (not in th
Hi!
On Debian we're building qemu tools (eg qemu-img &Co) on systems which don't
support qemu-system. And after commit c891c24b1a "os-posix: asynchronous
teardown for shutdown on Linux", this fails on certain architectures too,
notable on ia64. This is because ia64 does not have the "traditiona
