[Qemu-discuss] SunOS 4.1.4 on Qemu 2.10.0 on Mac OS X 10.12.6 on mid 2012 Intel MBP w/16GB RAM

Hi, I heard on the TUHs mailing list that it was possible to emulate sparc on qemu and further that you could run SunOS. So, I did the following: brew install qemu - which got qemu on my mac rounded up the sunos 4.1.4 install media and the sparcstation 5 version 2.15 boot prom and then

Re: [Qemu-discuss] Coldfire 5282 Support

OK so really even though I see the driver sending the ARP requests, they’re not actually ever making it to the host, even though the PCAP file shows them. In other words, the PCAP file is "on the guest side" of the connection not "the host side of the connection". Correct? If that’s the case

Re: [Qemu-discuss] Fwd: Why iocl with RNDGETENTCNT does not work?

On 3 October 2017 at 11:50, Marco Aurélio Lopes Barbosa wrote: > if (ioctl(fd, RNDGETENTCNT, ) == -1) > When I run this program with qemu-x86_64-static I got the error > > Unsupported ioctl: cmd=0x80045200 > ioctl failed > I've patched qemu to forward the

[Qemu-discuss] Fwd: Why iocl with RNDGETENTCNT does not work?

Hello, Consider the following program #include #include #include #include #include #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int success = 0; int fd = open("/dev/urandom", O_RDONLY); if (fd != -1) { int entropy; if (ioctl(fd, RNDGETENTCNT, ) == -1)

Re: [Qemu-discuss] Coldfire 5282 Support

Hi Thomas; I was telling this to Peter as well offline. The initial problem just FYI was that the routing on the m68k side was nonexistent, so it wasn’t even sending anything to the net drivers at all. I turned on the debugging in the net driver and there was no traffic. It looks like there is

[Qemu-discuss] ehci warning: guest requested more bytes than allowed

Hi all, I use the lastest git version of qemu on Debian stretch, then I install the masos sierra as the guest. When I run the macos guest by using the qemu-system-x86_64 from command line, I always see the following info: --- ehci warning: guest requested more bytes than

Re: [Qemu-discuss] performances of qemu 2.10.0

On 09/27/2017 10:49 PM, Pierre Couderc wrote: I have compiled and built from git qemu tag 2.10.0 (./configure --target-list=x86_64-softmmu --enable-debug) and I find it much more slow than the debian package that I used before. kvm is enabled. The mouse does not react, tests done with host