Agreed, int to double conversion could be optimal.
oops, that should be 'Agreed, int to double conversion could be problematic'
Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2011, um 09.19:23 schrieb Marco Hugentobler:
I thought that if data type of the source is integer the provider
could represent them as
What about an approach where the out-of-bound values are assigned the last
value only if reprojection is used (and if the layer does not have a null
value)?
My two cents, from a user perspective.
We're facing this dilemma with Geotools, where reprojected color mapped
rasters (thorugh SLD)
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Marco Hugentobler
marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch wrote:
oops, that should be 'Agreed, int to double conversion could be problematic'
Why do you consider it problematic, because it occupies too much space?
Regarding precision, int to double is OK, I believe, but
Hi Radim
Why do you consider it problematic, because it occupies too much space?
Regarding precision, int to double is OK, I believe, but long to
double is not because double has only 52bits to store mantissa. GDAL
however does not define long,
the longest integer is GDT_Int32
My concern
Hello Tim,
I am working on the ticket https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/2974 .
The ticket deals with Attribute search, as there can be three ways of NULL
searches were possible.
i.e 1) searching records with NULL values.
2) searching records containing NULL as text string.
Hi
Radio button one is probably more appropriate in this case.
Regards
Tim
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:17 PM, sunilraj.kiran
sunilraj.ki...@kcubeconsulting.com wrote:
Hello Tim,
I am working on the ticket https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/2974 .
The ticket deals with Attribute search,
Werner wrote:
What i'd like to see also in 2.0 is the threading and globe thing as ...
+1 I think those two things could be the big new features in version 2.0.
Best wishes,
Anita
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Hi
Radio button one is probably more appropriate in this case.
Regards
Tim
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:17 PM, sunilraj.kiran
sunilraj.ki...@kcubeconsulting.com wrote:
Hello Tim,
I am working on the ticket https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/2974 .
The ticket deals with Attribute search,
What i'd like to see also in 2.0 is the threading and globe thing as ...
+1 I think those two things could be the big new features in version 2.0.
And the new rasters, of course :) One of the biggest things I'd expect from
2.0 is better native raster handling.
I agree with Andreas. Popups are not good for this use case.I just
think using: column IS NULL is correct for both cases and I think it would
confuse people to make them pick.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.netwrote:
Hi,
I'd rather prefer to have this
On 18 January 2011 08:50, Werner Macho werner.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
- merge many of the plugins directly into trunk (north arrow, gps,
coordinate capture, delimited text, georeferencer, some form of raster
colours / 1 band raster colour table etc.)
+1 very good idea .. I'd like to see more
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2011, um 07.05:56 schrieb Tim Sutton:
Hi All
I think its time to start thinking about getting 2.0 'out'. What do
others think? The major goal would be to
- clean up the api and remove cruft / inelegant parts / backwards
compatibility wrappers
- do an overhaul
Hi all,
I like your enthusiasm. However, a release of 2.0 in September at
Fossgis, with two additional in between releases, sounds a bit too
ambitious to me. Maybe we also shouldn't put too much pressure on us
just because the Fossgis conference is happening. There should be a
release (maybe
Il giorno mar, 18/01/2011 alle 15.04 +0100, Andreas Neumann ha scritto:
switch to the new labeling and symbology engine is a priority (but there
is still a lot of work to do!)
agreed: Andreas, would you mind starting a wiki page on the missing
features?
thanks.
--
http://www.faunalia.it/pc
Hi Sunil,
On Tue, 18. Jan 2011 at 16:47:23 +0530, sunilraj.kiran wrote:
I am working on the ticket [1]https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/2974
. The ticket deals with Attribute search, as there can be three ways of
NULL searches were possible.
I did change some things in r15054:
[FEATURE]
I didn't realize part of the QGIS Python stuff used QtTest and didn't include
QtTest in the Mac QGIS. I'll have to package an update, watch for it.
On Jan 18, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Patrice Vetsel wrote:
Hi,
I'm searching to play with QGis and my bluetooth gps datalogger.
I'v founded this
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Patrice Vetsel ubu...@kagou.fr wrote:
from PyQt4.QtTest import *
File
/Applications/QGIS.app/Contents/MacOS/../Resources/python/qgis/utils.py,
line 279, in _import
mod = _builtin_import(name, globals, locals, fromlist, level)
ImportError: No module
Hi,
As Paolo suggested, I started a wiki page for problems/missing bits in
the new symbology. Please add your issues, so we can get a rather
complete view of what is still missing.
http://www.qgis.org/wiki/Switching_from_Old_to_New_Symbology_and_Labeling
This is just a start. I will add
On Jan 18, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Patrice Vetsel ubu...@kagou.fr wrote:
from PyQt4.QtTest import *
File
/Applications/QGIS.app/Contents/MacOS/../Resources/python/qgis/utils.py,
line 279, in _import
mod = _builtin_import(name,
Hi Andreas,
I proposed significant additions to the Rule based Renderer in a patch here:
http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3222
http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/attachment/ticket/3222/rule_renderer_patch_on_r15004-symbols_not_merged.diff
Applying this patch would solve several issues, including one
Why QGIS uses GEOS for reading vector than OGR?
--
Rashad
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Releasing 2.0 and still no table joins seems to be less than ideal to
me and will likely be criticized (e.g. in feature comparisons with other
GIS). I'd rather invest more time on the really needed stuff that a
basic 2D GIS should deliver, than in 3D. 3D, in my opinion, can wait for
2.0
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is out of scope for the new label engine, but it
would anyway be a nice feature:
Make the label text an answer to a SQL question instead of a single
field. In particular, make it possible to form strings from several
fields and fixed strings, e.g.
label = my_first_column
Hello Everyone,
As the Bug #2974 was fixed by Jurgen in Trunk version r15054,I
have started working on the next bug
https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3155
let me know whether anyone working on this bug?
Regards,
Sunil
___
Qgis-developer
Hi Mayeul,
I added your ticket to
http://www.qgis.org/wiki/Switching_from_Old_to_New_Symbology_and_Labeling#Rule_based_Renderer
Regarding the wiki access: please ask Otto Dassau, the community
advisor, for wiki access.
Andreas
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:19:44 +0100 (CET), wrote:
Hi Andreas,
sending this also to the list, since my answer only went to Robert.
Andreas
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Wiki page: switching from old to new
symbology, missing bits
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:58:38 +0100
From: Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.net
To: Robert
26 matches
Mail list logo
