Any news about that speed problem???
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Slow-rendering-of-shapefile-in-python-qgis-application-tp6591319p7019678.html
Sent from the qgis-developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
it is much better now on qgis master/trunk, but performances have
changed a lot lately
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/1978#change-26447
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:03 AM, leonidas wrote:
> Any news about that speed problem???
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabb
Just a technical curiosity: why pyqgis rendering should be slower then
qgis? The loading and rendering are performed by the C++ code, and I don't
see where python plays an inpacting role...
giovanni
2011/11/22 Giovanni Manghi
> it is much better now on qgis master/trunk, but performances have
>
On 2011-11-19 02:17, Hilmy Hashim wrote:
> +1 and it would be great if I could limit the list of projections to the
> ones relevant to my work - usually less than 10. I don't need to see
> projections for the whole world.
That's where the 'recently used crs's' block is for?
(see http://hub.qgis.o
Dear QGIS Developers, Users and Supporters!
We are pleased to announce that QGIS 1.7.2 is now available. This is a
bugfix release over version 1.7.1. A detailed changelog is available on
our home page[1].
Binary downloads[2] are already available but some are still making
their way to the do
Hi,
Today I've added a couple of new fields and features to the web app:
-Added tracker, repository, deprecated (#18, #19, #4265)
those new fields are optional but a warning is issued if thy are
empty, the message also suggests to create a repository on
hub.qgis.org
the deprecated field mar
Hi
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I've added a couple of new fields and features to the web app:
>
>
> - Added tracker, repository, deprecated (#18, #19, #4265)
>
> those new fields are optional but a warning is issued if thy are
> empty, the message
Less than 10 but certainly more than 4, especially when qgis creates user
defined entries for unknown or undefined crses. The recently used set will
be lost. Most of the time I only need a set of crses for the area of
interest I'm working on. I don't need to see the crses for other parts of
the wor
On 11/22/2011 01:55 PM, Hilmy Hashim wrote:
> Less than 10 but certainly more than 4, especially when qgis creates user
> defined
> entries for unknown or undefined crses. The recently used set will be lost.
> Most of
agreed, IMHO 6 to 8 should be ok for most people (unless we want to introduce
My magic number has always been 7 for a list of things :)
Thanks.
Hilmy Harun Hashim
On Nov 22, 2011 9:26 PM, "Paolo Cavallini" wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 01:55 PM, Hilmy Hashim wrote:
> > Less than 10 but certainly more than 4, especially when qgis creates
> user defined
> > entries for unknown or
Hi Devs,
please have a look at http://hub.qgis.org/issues/4560
seems a serious problem to me
qgis 1.7.2 both standalone and osgeo4w crash when trying to select a
recently used crs
Regards,
Richard
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.
Hi,
I agree, the scale is also broken in 1.7.1 and 1.7.2 (at least using
projected CRSs), while is fixed in master.
cheers
-- Giovanni --
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> please have a look at http://hub.qgis.org/issues/4560
>
> seems a serious proble
Hi Gary
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Gary Sherman wrote:
> A couple of questions for those of you fresh from the HF/planning session:
>
> 1. When will old symbology be removed?
In 2.0 release.
> 2. Will there be a unique value renderer in new symbology?
There is 'categorized symbol' render
Going to dive deeper into that tomorrow .. probably time for a 1.7.3 :-)
Regards Werner
Am 22.11.2011 20:06 schrieb "Giovanni Manghi" :
> Hi,
>
> I agree, the scale is also broken in 1.7.1 and 1.7.2 (at least using
> projected CRSs), while is fixed in master.
>
> cheers
>
> -- Giovanni --
>
> On
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Giovanni Manghi
wrote:
> Hi Gary
>
>
>
>
>> 2. Will there be a unique value renderer in new symbology?
>
>
> I agree, using the categorized symbology with a random color ramp
> produces not good results (many times with adjacent polygons with the
> same color), wit
On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Martin Dobias wrote:
> Hi Gary
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Gary Sherman wrote:
>> A couple of questions for those of you fresh from the HF/planning session:
>>
>> 1. When will old symbology be removed?
>
> In 2.0 release.
>
>> 2. Will there be a unique
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Does anyone have problem withthis?:
>
> https://github.com/qgis/Quantum-GIS/pull/63
>
> This commit moves the providers into their own dir
> (lib/qgis/providers) instead of mixing them with plugins. The reason
> for this is to have a
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Gary Sherman wrote:
>
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Martin Dobias wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Gary Sherman wrote:
>>> A couple of questions for those of you fresh from the HF/planning session:
>>>
>>> 1. When will old symbology be
On Nov 22, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Martin Dobias wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> Does anyone have problem withthis?:
>>
>> https://github.com/qgis/Quantum-GIS/pull/63
>>
>> This commit moves the providers into their own dir
>> (lib/qgis/providers) instead
Dear community,
we are going to migrate the QGIS wiki from MediaWiki to Redmine today. This
means we will set the current MediaWiki to read-only this afternoon at 3pm
CET and will announce the URL to the new wiki and other changes as soon as
finished the migration.
There will be some work to pol
20 matches
Mail list logo
