Hi All
Please take a moment to tell us what you think: Should the 'GIS' icon
theme be default in QGIS 2.0 (the next release of QGIS). Please visit
our poll here to cast your vote:
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=4ffb5dfae4b08ad9dfac3f70
In case you are not familiar with the fact that QGIS
Hi Larry,
Currently, I have to manually move a label to have its coords written.
it is known issue. If you want to have the label automatically rotated
using a data defined value I think you will need to use the old
labelling engine.
cheers
-- Giovanni --
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:35:07PM +0200, Daniel Lee wrote:
Dear list,
As this is my first post to this list, first of all hello ;)
I'm really excited about the new version of QGIS. Working with OpenSUSE
12.1 64-bit, I upgraded from the Geo repository to 1.8.0. Now, however,
QGIS won't
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:28:07AM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
Hi All
Please take a moment to tell us what you think: Should the 'GIS' icon
theme be default in QGIS 2.0 (the next release of QGIS). Please visit
our poll here to cast your vote:
2012/7/10 Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net:
Like, is it shared across multiple applications, improving consistency
of desktop lookfeel ?
AFAIK, this icon theme also used in GRASS GUI
--
Alexander Bruy
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Hi!
Is there any reason why would one want to use the 'GIS' theme other than
personal preference ?
Like, is it shared across multiple applications, improving consistency
of desktop lookfeel ?
As far as I can see (and already wrote in my email) GRASS is using the
GIS Icon Theme in in their
2012/7/10 Yves Jacolin (free) yjaco...@free.fr:
Am I the only one finding the new QGIS theme icon so ugly (sorry if the
word seems strong, I can't find another one as my vocabulary is limited)?
hm, are you referring to Robert's icon theme? Well this is really
personal taste, and I would
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 07:31 -0700, haubourg wrote:
Hi all, i would like to have your feedbacks on that point, before
asking new features.
I agree, an explicit add table button should be added.
cheers
-- Giovanni --
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Hi there,
I also think the GRASS theme is great, although I have to say that I'm a
long-time GRASS user. I've often heard complaints about QGIS' icon set,
especially in Windows - people feel that it looks a bit unserious, although
I don't see it that way. However, I do see great advantages in
Hi there,
Since I'm using the binary from the repository, I wasn't sure what exactly
I should wipe out - I don't have anything in /usr/local/lib/ except for a
python folder. Instead, I deinstalled QGIS completely using my package
manager. As far as I understand it, that should wipe out my system
Hi,
2012/7/10 Daniel Lee l...@isi-solutions.org:
I also think the GRASS theme is great, although I have to say that I'm a
it's not a GRASS theme. wxGUI just uses part of icons from [1] which
was designed by Robert Szczepanek as a generic GIS-related icon set
(AFAIU).
Martin
[1]
Le 10/07/2012 10:05, Sandro Santilli a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:28:07AM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
Hi All
Please take a moment to tell us what you think: Should the 'GIS' icon
theme be default in QGIS 2.0 (the next release of QGIS). Please visit
our poll here to cast your vote:
I agree that the current solution is not ideal. I did some mockups of
an idea I had during the last hackfest. Which can be found here[0]
and here[1]. It would unify all the open logic into a single dialog
and save space on the tool bar.
[0]
You can get a good overview over Robert's work at
http://robert.szczepanek.pl/icons.php
Anita
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
2012/7/10 Daniel Lee l...@isi-solutions.org:
I also think the GRASS theme is great, although I have to say that
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:33:23PM +0200, Daniel Lee wrote:
Hi there,
Since I'm using the binary from the repository, I wasn't sure what exactly
I should wipe out - I don't have anything in /usr/local/lib/ except for a
python folder. Instead, I deinstalled QGIS completely using my package
Very good Nathan. I totally support the idea!
giovanni
2012/7/10 Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com
I agree that the current solution is not ideal. I did some mockups of
an idea I had during the last hackfest. Which can be found here[0]
and here[1]. It would unify all the open logic into
Hi!
Well I won't say ugly in any way - even if I would not like them.
I guess Yves would not have taken such a word but he explained it that
his vocabulary is limited.
Of course it is personal preference for everyone - surely. But as
Robert tries to unify the icons for all GIS I am strongly in
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:50:19PM +0200, Anita Graser wrote:
You can get a good overview over Robert's work at
http://robert.szczepanek.pl/icons.php
I think the set being under OSGEO wings is a very good motivation
to switch over. http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Graphics
Hey, there's also a
Hey All,
This is a just a quick email to let everyone know that I have changed
the way that arguments are passed to a layers Init Python function.
That is the option that you find in the Layer Properties dialog on the
General tab. If you are using this then this will affect you and you
will know
Hi Nathan,
This makes sense to me. I will have to adapt my code but it is more
convenient and powerful now.
Thanks a lot,
Andreas
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:07:19 +1000, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
Hey All,
This is a just a quick email to let everyone know that I have changed
the way that arguments
Hello,
Le 10/07/2012 12:58, Werner Macho a écrit :
Hi!
Well I won't say ugly in any way - even if I would not like them.
I guess Yves would not have taken such a word but he explained it that
his vocabulary is limited.
Yes, as said it is definitevely too strong, my apologies for this.
Of
Hi Nathan
Could you add an entry to
http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/API_changes_for_version_20 ?
Regards,
Marco
Am 10.07.2012 13:07, schrieb Nathan Woodrow:
Hey All,
This is a just a quick email to let everyone know that I have changed
the way that arguments are passed to a layers
Marco,
Just added a section for it.
- Nathan
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Marco Hugentobler
marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch wrote:
Hi Nathan
Could you add an entry to
http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/API_changes_for_version_20 ?
Regards,
Marco
Am 10.07.2012 13:07, schrieb
Il 10/07/2012 12:47, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
I agree that the current solution is not ideal. I did some mockups of
an idea I had during the last hackfest. Which can be found here[0]
and here[1]. It would unify all the open logic into a single dialog
and save space on the tool bar.
[0]
Hi Nathan,
You're my hero !
I dream of a unified single «Add data» button / menu entry at night ! Users
don't care about «add shapefile» «add raster» «add anotherformatentry». They
just want to add data to the map. Let's rationalize all that.
Le mardi 10 juillet 2012 12:47:11, Nathan Woodrow a
Super, thx
Marco Bernasocchi (mobile)
http://opengis.ch
On Jul 10, 2012 1:07 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
This is a just a quick email to let everyone know that I have changed
the way that arguments are passed to a layers Init Python function.
That is the option
I really like your unified GUI Nathan! Nice..
I would just add a small place for csv data overview (popup window?) and
character encoding listbox.
Anoter idea: An option to display all files (*.*) in folders would be nice
too. For example, there is no filter today to access xls datas, but gdal
Yeah I think having a show all files would be a good option. My main
goal for the dialog is to do a way with as much of the filesystem feel
as possible (but not removing it completely) because IMO there is has
always been this divide in GIS software with the file system on one
side, which people
We tried the merge into one button idea once and lets just say it
didn't go down too well with the users :)
- Nathan
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Etienne Tourigny
etourigny@gmail.com wrote:
I thinks it's a great idea also.
Here is a simple modification (screenshot attached) which
How long ago was that?
Now there are 10 buttons in the Layers Toolbar (8 of which are for
adding new layers) - which I think is a lot of clutter. I personally
shrink that toolbar to just a few icons.
Etienne
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
We tried
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah I think having a show all files would be a good option. My main
goal for the dialog is to do a way with as much of the filesystem feel
as possible (but not removing it completely) because IMO there is has
always
Hi,
Le mardi 10 juillet 2012 14:47:19, Etienne Tourigny a écrit :
Now there are 10 buttons in the Layers Toolbar (8 of which are for
adding new layers) - which I think is a lot of clutter. I personally
shrink that toolbar to just a few icons.
Having icons for opening layers of different kind
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 22:40 +1000, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
We tried the merge into one button idea once and lets just say it
didn't go down too well with the users :)
this is strange because the one button is exactly what most of other
gis software has :)
Well it wasn't one button with a dialog like what I have in mind but a
single button as a drop down menu. So it only de-cluttered the
toolbar but didn't solve the real issue of having heaps of buttons.
For me it's not the 8 buttons but rather the 8 different dialogs that
you get, this just leads
But then problems await down the road, when users do not understand why
some functionalities are sometimes possible, sometimes not possible. The
ultimate goal would be to implement everything for all providers, of
course, but this is a long term objective.
On 07/10/2012 08:57 PM, Vincent
I like it ! I never use these icons right now, because it would mean
going one by one over them and wait for the mouseover popup until I find
the one I want.
On 07/10/2012 08:38 PM, Etienne Tourigny wrote:
I thinks it's a great idea also.
Here is a simple modification (screenshot attached)
Il 10/07/2012 15:05, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
different enough to make you think. UI consistency is the one thing we
should aim for when designing this kind of stuff.
+1, an important goal IMHO
--
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
Nuovi
I don't think QGIS has any direct linking with [i]ODBC, but would use the Qt
ODBC plugin to connect with an ODBC driver. Note that I don't include the Qt
ODBC plugin in the Mac QGIS, but I could if that is supposed to work.
On Jul 9, 2012, at 10:40 PM, Noli Sicad wrote:
Hi,
I think it
I run Linux Mint 10 and I can connect to my MS SQL database without
any extra work. Just using the Qt ODBC drivers. You have to use a
ODBC DSN but other then that it works as expected. I might do a blog
post about it if I can get some time.
- Nathan
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Noli Sicad
Hi William,
I don't think QGIS has any direct linking with [i]ODBC, but would use the Qt
ODBC plugin to connect with an ODBC driver. Note that I don't include the
Qt ODBC plugin in the Mac QGIS, but I could if that is supposed to work.
I think it would be good to include Qt ODBC plugin for
Hi all,
We launched a wider call for funding. Still lacks a few bucks, but we're going
to get things done, so do not hesitate to join the effort !
http://www.oslandia.com/?p=1243
Contact me for more infos, remarks or whatever you want to express :)
Vincent
Le jeudi 28 juin 2012 09:46:08, Andreas
I agree. I always hide this Manage Layers toolbar when I start from a
new QGIS installation. I use the menu instead. The toolbar wastes just
too much screen space in my opinion. Maybe we should hide it by default?
I like the idea of having a drop-down button. It could be included in
the other
Hi,
The postgres provider apparently does a check on the input query and only
tolerates queries beginning with SELECT.
The more general SQL query form allows for queries not beginning with select,
but still being valid, as it is the case for CTEs. The only way to have qgis
load them is to wrap
I can confirm success on my OSX system also with the patch you supplied,
Giovanni. Cheers,
John
On Jul 9, 2012, at 8:13 AM, G. Allegri wrote:
The hack is working perfectly!
Tha Atlas plugin seems to be working now ;)
giovanni
2012/7/5 G. Allegri gioha...@gmail.com
Thanks to Jef, the
+1 for dropping the filter -- trust the user ! --strk;
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:10:23PM +0200, Vincent Picavet wrote:
Hi,
The postgres provider apparently does a check on the input query and only
tolerates queries beginning with SELECT.
The more general SQL query form allows for queries
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Vincent Picavet
vincent...@oslandia.com wrote:
The postgres provider apparently does a check on the input query and only
tolerates queries beginning with SELECT.
the so called SELECT statement to vector layer [1] was
implemented in PG and SL providers
Hi
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.net wrote:
I agree. I always hide this Manage Layers toolbar when I start from a new
QGIS installation. I use the menu instead. The toolbar wastes just too much
screen space in my opinion. Maybe we should hide it by default?
A question regarding the plans for the QGIS icon theme and the GRASS
plugin.
Currently GRASS (standalone) uses Robert's icons, but the QGIS
plugin with the default theme uses other icons. That already could
be a small bit of confusion. But when I switch QGIS to the
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:32:49PM +0300, Micha Silver wrote:
A question regarding the plans for the QGIS icon theme and the GRASS
plugin.
Currently GRASS (standalone) uses Robert's icons, but the QGIS plugin with
the default theme uses other icons. That already could be a small
Hi all,
I am compiling qGIS trunk on archlinux:
Linux-3.4.4-2-ARCH-x86_64-with-glibc2.3.4
I managed to install spatialindex and spatialite from AUR and configuration
with ccmake.. goes fine.
When I run make, I get:
[ 86%] Built target heatmapplugin
[ 86%] Building CXX object
Under Archlinux, you have to force the use of python 2 with these options:
PYTHON_LIBRARY=/usr/lib/libpython2.7.so
PYTHON_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/python2
PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR=/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages
PYTHON_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/python2.7/
If you compile for the first time, you may
Thank you Leyan! I am trying that right now.
2012/7/10 欧阳乐岩 ouyang.le...@hotmail.com
Under Archlinux, you have to force the use of python 2 with these options:
PYTHON_LIBRARY=/usr/lib/libpyt**hon2.7.so http://libpython2.7.so
PYTHON_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/**python2
With ccmake I can only configure the PYTHON_LIBRARY. I have set it to what
you suggested. A rerun of make halts at the same line.
I am trying AUR: aur/qgis-git 20120429-1 now
2012/7/10 Milo van der Linden m...@dogodigi.net
Thank you Leyan! I am trying that right now.
2012/7/10 欧阳乐岩
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:32:03 +0100
From: Giovanni Manghi giovanni.man...@faunalia.pt
To: haubourg regis.haubo...@eau-adour-garonne.fr
Cc: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Clarifying access to non geographical
datas
Message-ID:
AUR reported I was missing qwt5. All other dependencies where already in
place. The build at exactly the same percentage. I took qgis 1.8 from aur
and now it is working.
2012/7/11 Milo van der Linden m...@dogodigi.net
With ccmake I can only configure the PYTHON_LIBRARY. I have set it to what
Here is the command I used to configure trunk:
cmake ../Quantum-GIS -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=ON
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/my/prefix -DQWT_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/include/qwt5
-DQWT_LIBRARY=/usr/lib/libqwt5.so -DPYTHON_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/python2
Hi Nathan
I run Linux Mint 10 and I can connect to my MS SQL database without
any extra work. Just using the Qt ODBC drivers. You have to use a
ODBC DSN but other then that it works as expected. I might do a blog
post about it if I can get some time.
Please do a blog on Linux Mint 10 and
57 matches
Mail list logo
