[Qgis-developer] Back compatibility to Symbols in version <=1.8 with >=1.9

2012-12-19 Thread arunthe...@gmail.com
Hello all, Recently the bug #6897 [1] was filed pointing to the incompatibility between the symbols created before GSoC code and after GSoC code. The primary matter being incorporating multiple levels of nesting the symbols. Previous XML structure allowed only a single level of nesting. This XML

Re: [Qgis-developer] error running qgis master - sextante depends on psycopg2 - but this dependency isn't well known

2012-12-19 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi Etienne, On Wed, 19. Dec 2012 at 19:49:27 -0200, Etienne Tourigny wrote: > Ideally it could be a dependency to .deb files (or osgeo/whatever), It already is (debian and osgeo4w) Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH)

Re: [Qgis-developer] error running qgis master - sextante depends on psycopg2 - but this dependency isn't well known

2012-12-19 Thread Etienne Tourigny
Ideally it could be a dependency to .deb files (or osgeo/whatever), and the build notes could include that package. In any case, perhaps a one-time error window with a QErrorMessage that psycopg2 is needed for some algorithms. Etienne On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Victor Olaya wrote: > Sound

Re: [Qgis-developer] error running qgis master - sextante depends on psycopg2 - but this dependency isn't well known

2012-12-19 Thread Victor Olaya
Sounds good to me. I assumed that it would be installed, but it's a better idea to add it explicitly I will add a check to SEXTANTE, so in case it is not installed, it leaves out the algorithms that use it Thanks! Victor 2012/12/19 Etienne Tourigny : > Hi > > I had this problem today with a fr

[Qgis-developer] Qt 5 final released

2012-12-19 Thread Matthias Kuhn
Qt 5 final was released today. This will likely be of interest for us sooner or later. http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/12/19/qt-5-0/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=qt-5-0 ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http

Re: [Qgis-developer] API cleanup

2012-12-19 Thread Nathan Woodrow
Hey Alex, I think we should be removing them as I think that is a overall goal for 2.0. I think we can just remove them. We should be able to diff the API docs once 2.0 is out to find out which methods have been added or removed. That is my thinking anyway. - Nathan On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1

[Qgis-developer] API cleanup

2012-12-19 Thread Alexander Bruy
Hi all, anyone works on API (both C++ and Python) cleanup? As I can see there are about 90 deprecated methods available (for example, look at QgsRasterLayer class), maybe we have even more, because not all methods may be marked as deprecated. Should we remove them? If yes which procedure is corre

Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-developer Digest, Vol 86, Issue 41

2012-12-19 Thread Andre Jellema
Hi,   i am new to the qgis api using the code examples to get a better understanding.   https://github.com/qgis/qgis-code-examples    unfortunately I get a "layer not valid" message for examples 1 and 2.   fortunately the TIFF in example 4 does get loaded.   so based on ex 4 i added the following l

Re: [Qgis-developer] SAGA modules (version 2.1.0) through SEXTANTE on Mac OSX

2012-12-19 Thread Victor Olaya
Olav, Thanks for your contribution! > > There is no option "SAGA folder" in the SEXTANTE configuration like you have > when installing on Windows. I haven't checked on Linux, but I guess the > Unixes don't need this, as long as saga_cmd is in the path, right? Right, Mac and Linux should work in

[Qgis-developer] SAGA modules (version 2.1.0) through SEXTANTE on Mac OSX

2012-12-19 Thread Olav Peeters
Hi all, I managed to successfully get SAGA installed from source on Mac OSX 10.6.8 Since the instructions on the SAGA wiki (http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/saga-gis/wiki/Compiling%20SAGA%20on%20Mac%20OS%20X) did not seem to work well in my case, here is what I did: on a system (in my case OS

Re: [Qgis-developer] Legend group API fix

2012-12-19 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:05:13PM +0100, Martin Dobias wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > [...] > > > > Anyway, looking forward for Martin refactoring > > Just to avoid any confusion: I'm not going to refactor the legend - > though it would be great if someone d