-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 24/05/2013 07:36, Ziegler Stefan ha scritto:
Hi
I do have exactly the same problem. E.g. I almost cannot see any difference
between the WMS/WCS/WFS icons except on a very tiny part of the icons whereas
the old icons were easy to
Hi,
It's good time now to add colours to similar sets (like open * layer).
Waiting for proposals... with short description of your associations.
Robert
On 24.05.2013 08:28, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 24/05/2013 07:36, Ziegler Stefan ha scritto:
Hi
I just tested the same long text replacement passed in the parameter, but
after unchecking the feature Display in HTML. It appears that the
behaviour is the same : when using this feature (dynamic strings for text
item in composers) in the GetPrint request, QGIS does not respect the
position
you're right.
it is the only reason i still have many projects made in 1.8
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/editing-problems-tp5052578p5055466.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
that could be a useful option.
sincerely, from my point of view, many icons are
unreadable/undistinguishable so i click them correctly only because now i
remberer relative position
--
View this message in context:
+1
i.e. The difference between the Add PostGIS layers and Add SpatiaLite
layers is that one has a regular cylinder and the other has a fat-waisted
hour-glass cylinder - about 20-30 pixels are different in an icon that's
got 1024 pixels! I have to look at them in detail to see the differences.
And
I saved a simple project with 3 layers from 1.8.0.
Opening it with current master (commit:83445af) renders those
3 layers upside down (layer on top in the layer manager is
rendered at the bottom in the map canvas).
Moving layers around confirms the behavior: you have to move
point layers at
There are no additional svg folders defined in the settings. I have tried
to compile QGIS with debug enabled, but it doesn't seem that there are any
additional messages. Are there log files I should check? If I run make
test, there are quite a few failed tests:
Running tests...
Test project
I would like to ask the powers that be to keep the old and trusted icons.
They never failed me and the gui is quite uplifting. The new set may be
technically better but is not as friendly to users.
Please keep both.
Duarte
De: Jonathan Moules [mailto:jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk]
Hi all,
Larry, first, congratulations for the great labeling refactoring, this is
huge!
I couldn't find a way to enable the move / rotate tools in toolbar, in edit
mode, after having defined fields for X and Y in expression. Tools that
opens a dialog to modify font, text.. is working, but I
Hi!
-1 for keeping the old Icons..
I'd rather vote to probably leave them for 2.0 but get rid of them
afterwards.. It does not make any sense to have different sets of icons ..
And as GRASS is using the same icon set in their GUI it does indeed make
sense to use it probably in every open source
Hi,
-1. I agree with Werner. Having used the gis icon set for many months, I
have problems using the old ones. That's just how the human mind works.
Let's improve the gis icons where it makes sense but let us focus or work
on one set.
Best wishes,
Anita
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Werner
Hi,
I fully agree with Werner and Anita. gis theme is consistent, clear
and looks much better
then old icons. Maybe all we need is only some small improvements in
color scheme as
suggested by Robert.
So, -1 for keeping old icons.
2013/5/24, Anita Graser anitagra...@gmx.at:
Hi,
-1. I agree
Hi Jonathan,
You are right. Problem with new icons is that we have started with some
idea (add raster, vector, PostgreSQL layer) and end up with several
icons of the same type. First three icons are different, however have
too many elements. Next are worse, and Oracle and others wait for more
Agree as well with Werner and Anita.
It is just matter of a short adaptation period.
Ciao
On 05/24/2013 01:34 PM, Anita Graser wrote:
Hi,
-1. I agree with Werner. Having used the gis icon set for many months,
I have problems using the old ones. That's just how the human mind works.
Let's
Hi
I just opened a new issue : http://hub.qgis.org/issues/7894
Discussion can go on there.
Cheers
Michael
2013/5/24 kimaidou kimai...@gmail.com
Hi
I just tested the same long text replacement passed in the parameter,
but after unchecking the feature Display in HTML. It appears that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
See http://www.faunalia.eu/
All the best.
- --
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12
Hi Marco,
I'm afraid I respectfully disagree. A short adaptation period won't make
the icons more obvious.
I'm not a big QGIS user. If I want to use /any/ function in QGIS, I have to
stare at the icons and use the tooltips to figure out what button does
what, so I'm not adapted to the 1.8 set,
Hi Régis,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Régis Haubourg
regis.haubo...@eau-adour-garonne.fr wrote:
Hi all,
Larry, first, congratulations for the great labeling refactoring, this is
huge!
I couldn't find a way to enable the move / rotate tools in toolbar, in edit
mode, after having
Hi,
I'm along the lines of Werner, Anita, Marco... The new gis icon set
looks much more professional than the old icon set and the look of the
icon set actually gives the software a whole different look.
From what I've read here, the main concern lies on the add layer icons
which look too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 24/05/2013 17:42, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
I'm along the lines of Werner, Anita, Marco... The new gis icon set
looks much more professional than the old icon set and the look of the
icon set actually gives the software a whole different
Hi all,
I am trying to develop a plugin for QGIS with PyQgis and I am wondering how
is possible to get the adjacency for a network.
I have two layers, nodes.shp and link.shp. The nodes.shp are the vertex of
the links.shp. So my idea was to create a buffer of nodes.shp and then
intersect this
+1 with Paolo
I prefer the new default qgis icon set, but I do not understand why we need
to remove the other icon sets, as long as the qgis theme is the new
default one.
2013/5/24 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 24/05/2013 17:42,
Hi,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:10 AM, kimaidou kimai...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 with Paolo
I prefer the new default qgis icon set, but I do not understand why we
need to remove the other icon sets, as long as the qgis theme is the new
default one.
A big -1 for the project maintaining 2 themes.
Layer toolbar could look like this [1], except OWS icons.
Oracle Spatial logo was not found, so I took 'O' from Oracle, but it
looks ugly in this context. Combination of this 'O' with database symbol
doesn't look nice either. Some proposals ...?
We could leave old database symbol with
25 matches
Mail list logo
