-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 29/09/2013 16:41, Anita Graser ha scritto:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde rich...@duif.net
wrote:
I propose:
QGIS stable
QGIS development (build)
+1
and thanks for fighting for consistency!
agreed, thanks. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 27/09/2013 12:33, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
Hi all.
Using one layer from
http://www.pcn.minambiente.it/PCNDYN/catalogowcs.jsp
e.g.
http://wms.pcn.minambiente.it/wcs/dtm_20m
I immediately get an error:
WCS provider: Impossibile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 29/09/2013 12:48, Jrgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
Anyway, this this is not yet set in stone as I'm currently still sorting out
stuff related to the 2.0 release (e.g. in OSGeo4W) - and therefore didn't have
time to come with draft for this. So
Hi
The package suffix -dev or -devel are often used to mark packages
containing development files such as headers.
Therefore I would stick to another term for this purpose ( nightly,
master, alpha, beta, preview, testing, unstable, no strong opinion from
my side ), so we can use the same term
replicate rest call in a browser getting uri from qgis log (I don't know if
it's shown only in debug mode)... then posts uri and results
ciao ginetto
On 30 September 2013 08:14, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 27/09/2013 12:33,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 08:22:59AM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 29/09/2013 12:48, Jrgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
Anyway, this this is not yet set in stone as I'm currently still sorting out
stuff related to the 2.0 release (e.g. in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 30/09/2013 08:48, Gino Pirelli ha scritto:
replicate rest call in a browser getting uri from qgis log (I don't know if
it's
shown only in debug mode)... then posts uri and results
this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 30/09/2013 08:44, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
The package suffix -dev or -devel are often used to mark packages
containing development files such as headers.
Therefore I would stick to another term for this purpose ( nightly,
master, alpha,
Plugin OSM place search approval by geum.
The plugin version [354] OSM place search 0.6 Experimental is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/nominatim/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 27/09/2013 11:49, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
Anyone confirms? It happens a lot here.
this seems to be related to reprojection.
see http://hub.qgis.org/issues/8724
pretty nasty, highly reproducible here.
All the best.
- --
Paolo Cavallini -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-09-13 09:06, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 08:44, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
The package suffix -dev or -devel are often used to mark
packages containing development files such as headers. Therefore
I would stick to another term for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 30/09/2013 09:25, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto:
New proposal:
QGIS stable
QGIS testing
Ok?
this will encourage people to test it out, +1 for me.
thanks.
- --
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at
Yep, good for me.
On Mon 30 Sep 2013 09:27:06 CEST, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 09:25, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto:
New proposal:
QGIS stable
QGIS testing
Ok?
this will encourage people to test it out, +1 for me.
thanks.
--
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
good point - IMHO alpha, preview, testing, unstable are acceptable,
the others are less appropriate and understandable.
I would prefer Preview or Testing - as unstable implies that it
is less stable than the official releases, which is not
+1 for testing
On 09/30/2013 09:28 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
Yep, good for me.
On Mon 30 Sep 2013 09:27:06 CEST, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 09:25, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto:
New proposal:
QGIS stable
QGIS testing
Ok?
this will encourage people to test it out, +1 for me.
Hi Crhis,
Thanks a lot for your comments.
On 09/27/2013 10:08 PM, Chris Crook wrote:
Hi Denis
I'm not sure if you are suggesting adding this to the existing delimited text layer function (bad
idea!), or adding a new function using components of the existing delimited text layer. I say bad
+1
On 30 September 2013 09:25, Richard Duivenvoorde rdmaili...@duif.netwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-09-13 09:06, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 30/09/2013 08:44, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
The package suffix -dev or -devel are often used to mark
packages
+1 for testing too, which is explicit : users, please test it
2013/9/30 Gino Pirelli lui...@gmail.com
+1
On 30 September 2013 09:25, Richard Duivenvoorde rdmaili...@duif.netwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-09-13 09:06, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 30/09/2013
But obviously that makes it a much bigger task :-)
I'm not really sure it is any different. This is almost all the code you
would need (minus the field mapping stuff and error checking)
for feature in sourcelayer.getFeatures():
destlayer.dataProvider().addFeatures([feature])
By making it
Hi,
On Mon, 30. Sep 2013 at 08:53:06 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Also, insisting in the production of binary makes the release process more
complex than it could be. Binary packaging and source releases should be
separate processes, IMHO.
Any only else share the opinion that we should stop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 30/09/2013 10:30, Jrgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
Any only else share the opinion that we should stop making packages and trust
that others will pick up?
I have seen activity on Debian, do not know about the rest.
Certainly we'll have to deal
Am 30.09.2013 10:30, schrieb Jürgen E. Fischer:
Hi,
On Mon, 30. Sep 2013 at 08:53:06 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Also, insisting in the production of binary makes the release process more
complex than it could be. Binary packaging and source releases should be
separate processes, IMHO.
Interesting discussion.
Packaging isn't something I know much of anything about, but from a Windows
perspective, if there are bugfix releases, might it be worth releasing them
as patches/service packs rather than complete new releases? In a corporate
environment where software installation is
I'm not sure how feasible a service pack type release is. It might be
possible to ship only the binaries that have changed in a self extracting
zip but I'm not sure.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Jonathan Moules
jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk wrote:
be a lot of effort and potentially
Hi Richard,
there is a SlackBuild script at Slackbuilds.org (which is preferred
way to install packages in Slackware). It is also for 1.8 but can be
easily adopted for 2.0
2013/9/29 Richard Duivenvoorde rdmaili...@duif.net:
Hi,
I/m rewriting download page.
There you are pointed to
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:30:35AM +0200, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
On Mon, 30. Sep 2013 at 08:53:06 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Also, insisting in the production of binary makes the release process more
complex than it could be. Binary packaging and source releases should be
separate
Hi,
I have two questions regarding the print composer:
- is there anyway of using some fields to determine the printed bounding
box instead of using the feature's geometry?
if no, do you think it could be an interesting feature?
- While trying to use overview map, it did not print the
Hi,
I had actually been wondering if we should make a small deb that users
can double click that does the setup of the repos for them (creates the
source.list.d/qgis.list). Would even be awesome to make it detect the
version of the OS and put in the right repos for that version. Then we
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:30:35AM +0200, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
On Mon, 30. Sep 2013 at 08:53:06 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Also, insisting in the production of binary makes the release process more
complex than it
Olá,
gostaria de saber se existe algum componente para interagir com o QGis no
Delphi?
como posso abrir um mapa feito no QGis, no delphi?
[]'s
*Rogério Pett
www.pett.com.br*
--
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 03:10:44PM +0200, Anita Graser wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:30:35AM +0200, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
On Mon, 30. Sep 2013 at 08:53:06 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Also, insisting in the
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
Barry - To clarify again, the Ubuntugis version is the same version of
QGIS, what differs is GDAL, PROJ and GEOS - by significant version, ie
gdal 1.8 vs 1.10
This is critical because 1.10.x supports more of the
Hi Richard,
SlackBuilds.org is an one of the official repositories for Slackware.
It provides scripts with build/install rules (so called SlackBuilds) that
used to create packages from sources. This is correct way to install
packages in Slackware.
Slackbuilds are bash scripts that contain all
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:36:40PM +0300, Alexander Bruy wrote:
I contacted QGIS SlackBuild maintainer. Now at SlackBuilds.org there
is a SlackBuild for QGIS 1.8. SlackBuild for QGIS 2.0 already uploaded
(to be precise, it uploaded at 20-Sep-2013 19:33) and now waits for
approval. When it
I am new to QGIS 2.0.1 Modeler (Sextante) and not very able in Python
programming.
My question regard the use of field calculator (or advanced python field
calculator) inside the modeler. Is it possible to refer in the field
calculator formula to an input variable of the sextante model?
Example
I think if we have a dedicated Ubuntu and Windows build team and our
core developers could just add a tag and then get back to implementing
new cool features and solve nasty bugs, hesitation would be less.
I already hear the users of these two systems scream when there's a
release tagged but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 30/09/2013 17:40, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
I think if we have a dedicated Ubuntu and Windows build team and our
core developers could just add a tag and then get back to implementing
new cool features and solve nasty bugs, hesitation would be
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:40:04PM +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
I think if we have a dedicated Ubuntu and Windows build team and our
core developers could just add a tag and then get back to implementing
new cool features and solve nasty bugs, hesitation would be less.
I already hear the
On 09/30/2013 07:35 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com
wrote:
Barry - To clarify again, the Ubuntugis version is the same version of
QGIS, what differs is GDAL, PROJ and GEOS - by significant version, ie
gdal 1.8 vs 1.10
Tried adding that PPA, now saga conflicts with itself in synaptic.
And if I install with apt-get it removes Qgis. If I try and install
Qgis, it removes Saga.
$ sudo apt-get install saga
currently says
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible
FYI, there's a recently new ppa purge command which is awesome for
cleaning out ppas and stuff they installed back to base system.
As for this issue, I reread some stuff and saw a hint from Victor that
there's a checkbox in the plugin config to enable SAGA 2.0.8 to work
with QGIS 2+
I think SAGA
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 08:22:59AM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 29/09/2013 12:48, Jrgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
Anyway, this this is not yet set in stone as I'm currently still sorting
out
stuff related to the 2.0
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 08:22:59AM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 29/09/2013 12:48, Jrgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
Anyway, this this is
43 matches
Mail list logo
