Hi all,
I just noticed minor inconsistency in methods naming in QgsCoordinateTransform
class [0]. There is a setSourceCrs (only first letter in upper case in
Crs) method and setDestCRS (all letters are upper case in CRS).
Should we make them consistent, e.g use Crs everywhere? To prevent API
Just a follow up to this if other people ever have trouble with this.
I have managed to load my query layers by specifying False for the
loadDefaultStyleFlag parameter when I create the QgsVectorLayer. So
vlayer = QgsVectorLayer(uri.uri(), layerName, postgres, False)
This parameter stops QGIS
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:37:10PM +0100, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
But to quote Tim: We're not going anywhere. There will still be bugs in
QGIS
2.3 to work on after the release. And I trust that you're not going to stop
bug fixing just because the fixes don't make it into 2.2.
How about
On 21-02-14 10:53, Stott, James wrote:
Just a follow up to this if other people ever have trouble with this.
I have managed to load my query layers by specifying False for the
loadDefaultStyleFlag parameter when I create the QgsVectorLayer. So
...
It would be good to get details about this
I, my customers and without a doubt: Several thousands of ordinary users
of QGIS would simply _love_ the idea of having a stable branch which is
only updated with bugfixes. The problem with using QGS - weekly is
that you get the bugfixes, but also a lot of new - very untested -
technology.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 21/02/2014 11:35, Bo Victor Thomsen ha scritto:
I, my customers and without a doubt: Several thousands of ordinary users of
QGIS
would simply _love_ the idea of having a stable branch which is only updated
with
bugfixes. The problem with
What kind of resources are we talking about ? Maintainer duties,
developer resources, Sponsor money ? And how much ?
I might possibly be able to get some of my customers to cough up some
cash for a stable branch.
Regards
Bo Victor
Den 21-02-2014 11:49, Paolo Cavallini skrev:
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 21/02/2014 12:32, Bo Victor Thomsen ha scritto:
What kind of resources are we talking about ? Maintainer duties, developer
resources,
Sponsor money ? And how much ?
I might possibly be able to get some of my customers to cough up some cash
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:39:04PM +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 21/02/2014 12:32, Bo Victor Thomsen ha scritto:
What kind of resources are we talking about ? Maintainer duties, developer
resources,
Sponsor money ? And how much ?
I might possibly be able to get some of my customers
Hi,
Maybe I did not follow all discussion. But I see people posting tweets
and blogs everywhere that QGIS 2.2 will be available in 24h or something
similar.
Is this really true? Don't we require a couple of days for packaging,
testing that the binaries really work, etc.?
I am just a bit worried
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:17:23PM +, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Maybe I did not follow all discussion. But I see people posting tweets
and blogs everywhere that QGIS 2.2 will be available in 24h or something
similar.
Is this really true? Don't we require a couple of days for
I'm going on holiday for the next week. Maybe we kan discuss this
subject further after my holiday. And for others on list - sorry for the
noise
Regards
Bo Victor Thomsen
Den 21-02-2014 12:59, Sandro Santilli skrev:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:39:04PM +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il
Plugin MetaSearch Catalogue Client approval by rduivenvoorde.
The plugin version [464] MetaSearch Catalogue Client 0.1.0 is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/MetaSearch/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Hi all,
I am a bit lost at trying to build a custom QGIS app on a windows 7.
I have installed QGIS libs, Qt libs and minGW using osgeo4w installer
(thanks to Nathan's advices).
I have also installed Qt Creator 3.0.
Now in creator, I have configured Qt version as Qt 4.7. using
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, 21. Feb 2014 at 12:17:23 +, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Maybe I did not follow all discussion. But I see people posting tweets and
blogs everywhere that QGIS 2.2 will be available in 24h or something similar.
Is this really true? Don't we require a couple of days for
Hi Jürgen,
Thanks for the clarification.
Maybe in the future we could also test binary packages before we
officially release QGIS. After all this is what people use out their.
If packages are broken (even if QGIS from source is fine) this will be
bad for QGIS reputation. 95% of the QGIS users
Hi Denis,
On Fri, 21. Feb 2014 at 15:20:19 +0100, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
I have installed QGIS libs, Qt libs and minGW using osgeo4w installer
(thanks to Nathan's advices).
mingw using the osgeo4w installer? That might be there for GRASS.
But QGIS and Qt in OSGeo4W is built with Visual C++
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, 21. Feb 2014 at 15:30:45 +, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Maybe in the future we could also test binary packages before we
officially release QGIS. After all this is what people use out their.
If packages are broken (even if QGIS from source is fine) this will be
bad for QGIS
Hi Jürgen,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
It seems I should finally use Visual C++.
I will give it a try this weekend!
Thanks again and happy release ;)
Denis
On 21 Feb 2014, at 16:24, Jürgen E. Fischer j...@norbit.de wrote:
Hi Denis,
On Fri, 21. Feb 2014 at 15:20:19 +0100, Denis Rouzaud
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 05:13:59PM +0100, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
But a lot of people will always wait for the release before they start to test
and find stuff that no one ran into while testing - of course some of those
could be found in a separate package testing phase (and with a extensive
Greetings Devs,
I have a large number of shapefiles I need to process and have had limited
success using QGis 2.0.1 with it's python console.
// This works -
from osgeo import ogr
canvas =
qgis.utils.iface.mapCanvas()
allLayers = canvas.layers()
for i in allLayers: i.selectAll(); print
Plugin qgisio approval by pka.
The plugin version [466] qgisio 0.1 Experimental is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/qgisio/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
22 matches
Mail list logo
