Hi,
only for better understanding every details,
there is a list of actual member list of PSC.
And my curiosity is for the affermations:
after all, only 3 out of 7 positions are
meant for developers
I guess a short curriculum of every psc member could help to understand
the role of
Hi all.
I noticed that a field widget (in my case, hidden) is saved in a project, but
not in
a style: is this the intended behaviour? In my view it seems more intuitive if
this
would be saved in both.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi QGIS e PostGIS:
Il 18/08/2014 18:05, René-Luc Dhont ha scritto:
Hi Paolo,
A customer reported this bug. Can you open an issue ?
Done:
https://github.com/3liz/lizmap-web-client/issues/81
Thanks.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
2014-08-25 7:46 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
Il 21/08/2014 09:28, Werner Macho ha scritto:
Ah ok - now I know.
Translators made me aware of some facts that are not true anymore in
context help and I adjusted the information in this context help
(fe4e552e) to more reflect
Il 25/08/2014 09:25, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto:
this is a good choice, just make sure that the context help is also
available when a user is offline.
Agreed, that's why the first choice I mentioned was replacing, instead of
linking.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
2014-08-25 9:27 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
Il 25/08/2014 09:25, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto:
this is a good choice, just make sure that the context help is also
available when a user is offline.
Agreed, that's why the first choice I mentioned was replacing, instead of
Seems to be a good task for the upcoming hackfest :)
I am going to take some time with Richard anyway .. I think this could
be adressed too ..
regards
Werner
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Alessandro Pasotti apaso...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-08-25 9:27 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini
This topic already added to hackfest agenda [0]. Feel free to add ideas and/or
other possible solutions.
[0] http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/12_QGIS_Developer_Meeting_in_Essen_2014
2014-08-25 11:04 GMT+03:00 Werner Macho werner.ma...@gmail.com:
Seems to be a good task for the upcoming
Hi Andrea,
First of all, I tend to agree with Marco, where QEP should be voted when there
is a general agreement on them. The PSC voting should therefore be enough.
As for you question about QEP vs funders.
Le lundi 25 août 2014 08:41:29, aperi2007 a écrit :
[snip]
Also, AOAIK an important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
On 25/08/2014 07:42, Martin Dobias wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Nyall Dawson
nyall.daw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/08/2014 3:33 am, Even Rouault
even.roua...@spatialys.com wrote:
Le vendredi 22 août 2014 17:19:34, Marco
Hell,
You speak of discussion with community.
This is agreement, but the only important to be sure of the work is the
PSC agreement.
If after 2 weeks the PSC say nothing one could start with a contract
for the development ?
As Marco said, and as it always has been the case in the QGIS
Le lundi 25 août 2014 11:42:12, Vincent Picavet a écrit :
Hell,
I meant Hello, of course, no offence :-/
v.
You speak of discussion with community.
This is agreement, but the only important to be sure of the work is the
PSC agreement.
If after 2 weeks the PSC say nothing one could
Hey,
I am still of the opinion that the PSC doesn't need to be involved in the
vote unless there is a split. Most QEPs will be at a technical level and
might take a bit to parse, others might not be.
It might be best to have categories or QEPs so that different groups have
different votes. A
Hi martin,
I'll try to have a check of your modification on wms legend next days (or week)
regards, Luigi Pirelli (luigi.pire...@faunalia.it - lui...@gmail.com)
On 22 August 2014 13:02, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
In recent weeks I have been busy with the second part of
What mean the community dont agree ?
More explain.
If 3 or 4 user community say no or ask different solutions . It is the
community think ?
I guess the PSC should not ne only a simply executor of the community
think, but the real director of the project.
Often the community think a thing bit thw
Hi All
The feature of saving styles and .ui forms in a pg/splite database seems
very useful but somehow I can not load any .ui forms from my database.
I successfully saved a .ui form into the database and now I find it in
layer_styles.ui. But the tag editform (layer_styles.styleQML) is
pointing to
Hi,
I found that a new plugin DimLao Has no code repo and description
https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/dimlao/
regards, Luigi Pirelli
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
probably it's better to change the subject of the thread in something
more useful
about saving ui in SL, if confirmed, could you prepare test data or
prepare a description of the problem filing a tiket?
regards, Luigi Pirelli (luigi.pire...@faunalia.it - lui...@gmail.com)
On 25 August 2014
Hi,
It seems like most of us are still confused about mandatory metadata
in Python plugins.
There have been a lot of discussions on this topic in the past and I
would like to resume the discussion.
IIRC the most debated questions were:
* if homepage must be mandatory
* if tracker must be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
On 25/08/2014 17:01, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
Hi,
It seems like most of us are still confused about mandatory
metadata in Python plugins.
There have been a lot of discussions on this topic in the past and
I would like to resume the
Dear all,
up to QGIS 2.2 there was an Option in Settings - Options - Map Tools,
identify section:
Open feature form, if a single feature is identified
I can not find that option in QGIS 2.4 and QGIS dev anymore. It is still
in the lastest docs
Hi all.
Il 25/08/2014 17:06, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
I agree they should remain optional for now.
After a few months of managing the plugin approval queue, I still do not
understand
what is the advantage of having plugins without a repo and bugtracker.
I agree that a home page is not a
Hi André,
On Mon, 25. Aug 2014 at 17:26:02 +0200, Andre Joost wrote:
Open feature form, if a single feature is identified
I can not find that option in QGIS 2.4 and QGIS dev anymore.
It's in the identify dialog now.
It is still in the lastest docs
2014-08-25 17:29 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
Hi all.
Il 25/08/2014 17:06, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
I agree they should remain optional for now.
After a few months of managing the plugin approval queue, I still do not
understand
what is the advantage of having plugins
Hello,
Hi all.
Il 25/08/2014 17:06, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
I agree they should remain optional for now.
After a few months of managing the plugin approval queue, I still do not
understand what is the advantage of having plugins without a repo and
bugtracker. I agree that a home page is
2014-08-25 17:46 GMT+02:00 Vincent Picavet vincent...@oslandia.com:
Hello,
Hi all.
Il 25/08/2014 17:06, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
I agree they should remain optional for now.
After a few months of managing the plugin approval queue, I still do not
understand what is the advantage of having
Hi,
Well, I did follow these guidelines (which proved successful earlier
on), but I recently get these error messages which have to do with the
expiration of the public key. I have the same issue in Linux Mint Qiana
as well.
Hopefully someone can take a closer look.
Op 22-08-14 om 11:51
Hi fsLori,
On Mon, 25. Aug 2014 at 18:45:25 +0200, fsLori wrote:
Well, I did follow these guidelines (which proved successful earlier
on), but I recently get these error messages which have to do with the
expiration of the public key. I have the same issue in Linux Mint Qiana
as well.
Thanks for this key Jürgen.
And now I do find the updated key on the site you mentioned!
fsLori
Op 25-08-14 om 18:49 schreef Jürgen E. Fischer:
Hi fsLori,
On Mon, 25. Aug 2014 at 18:45:25 +0200, fsLori wrote:
Well, I did follow these guidelines (which proved successful earlier
on), but I
Am 25.08.2014 17:34, schrieb Jürgen E. Fischer:
Hi André,
On Mon, 25. Aug 2014 at 17:26:02 +0200, Andre Joost wrote:
Open feature form, if a single feature is identified
I can not find that option in QGIS 2.4 and QGIS dev anymore.
It's in the identify dialog now.
There is an option to
Il 25/08/2014 16:49, Luigi Pirelli ha scritto:
Hi,
I found that a new plugin DimLao Has no code repo and description
https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/dimlao/
And the bugtracker returns an Access denied.
Thanks for noticing.
Could the author please fix this?
All the best.
--
Paolo
Hi Luigi
I have no problems saving layer style and a .ui to spatialite DB. I can
also load the style back from SL. But I can not find how to load the ui
form.
I am not sure if it is just me who can not find this hidden feature or if
it is actually missing. Can someone please confirm this and I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/08/2014 17:46, Vincent Picavet wrote:
Hello,
Hi all.
Il 25/08/2014 17:06, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
I agree they should remain optional for now.
After a few months of managing the plugin approval queue, I still
do not understand what
Since I'm not a contributor to the main project, just some plugins, I'm not
sure my voice will count for much but I think Tim hits on an important
point.
As as a developer of plugins for my company, I have created repos and bug
trackers for the plugins I created because I was asked to but they
Hi,
The reason I moved the option is because it wasn't really a option in the
first place. Something like that doesn't belong in the options dialog as it
can be changed more then once during a session, and if you are having to
visit the options dialog for that then it's in the wrong place.
Strange. There is a repository tag:
https://bitbucket.org/edigonzales/qgis_dimlao/src/f459baa2c67cdbe2ec48a249e406cd3faa33e7a0/metadata.txt?at=master
But it does not show in the plugin repo.
Regards
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
Hi Martin,
This sounds quite exciting!
Thanks a lot for this large refactoring!
I can't tell much for the code part. However, I have a few remarks from
testing:
* Removing a symbol in the rule based symbology that was used as a group
without any symbol does not removie it from the legend.
37 matches
Mail list logo
