On 29 June 2015 at 19:16, Alessandro Pasotti apaso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
now that the feature freeze is over, can somebody please merge the QGIS
server refactoring PR?
This would bring python bindings for the server library and python tests for
QGIS server.
A first python test is
Hi Hugo
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Hugo Mercier hugo.merc...@oslandia.com wrote:
Hi,
Exhuming this old thread: like Paolo, I can't make work the Enable
snapping on intersection. I guess this is supposed to allow snapping on
intersection of different geometries even when no vertex is
Hi,
On Mon, 29. Jun 2015 at 10:55:42 +0200, DelazJ wrote:
notice the new(?) qgis-ltr entry. Great, All is ok.
Well. not that new. The notes about the ltr packages are from Apr 14th
(although once the is a new latest release was replaced with 2.10 on May
11th).
But that note is gone in the
Hi Martin,
On 29/06/2015 13:15, Martin Dobias wrote:
Hi Hugo
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Hugo Mercier hugo.merc...@oslandia.com
wrote:
Hi,
Exhuming this old thread: like Paolo, I can't make work the Enable
snapping on intersection. I guess this is supposed to allow snapping on
2015-06-29 12:22 GMT+02:00 Nyall Dawson nyall.daw...@gmail.com:
On 29 June 2015 at 19:16, Alessandro Pasotti apaso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
now that the feature freeze is over, can somebody please merge the QGIS
server refactoring PR?
This would bring python bindings for the server
Hi dev,
I'm using qgis master and I'm trying to use the difference tool between two
layers (from the vector menu and processing).
On the map canvas, the result looks fine, I get less features displayed.
However my result layer contains exactly the same number of features than
my original layer.
You can also use iface object provided by Python wrapper from qgis.utils.
So in get_qgis_app instead of having the mock QgisInterface, you can do
something like:
```
from qgis.utils import iface
IFACE = iface
```
I think in InaSAFE, we don't want unnecessary implementations from the
iface from
I just looked at the code base. If you are patient enough to get that
sorted out, I can look at that around the weekend and make a PR. One of the
problem is I see that you are playing around with get_qgis_app in the main
code (MainDialog). That function is only intended for testing purpose.
On
Any instance of qgis_get_app() outside of /test is only my attempts to get
his testing working, so I'll dig out the commit which put it there and
revert it. I'll have a look at your guidance on implementing iface, but if
you are able and interested to have a look as well, then of course I'd be
On 31/01/2014 17:23, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 31/01/2014 15:46, Jakob Lanstorp ha scritto:
Snap to intersection makes you snap to just that intersection point. Did a
test with two polygon layers and a point layer. Adding a point to the point
layer, while within the snap tolerance, made the
Hi,
On Mon, 29. Jun 2015 at 10:13:53 +0200, DelazJ wrote:
I do know. Does it mean that, still through osgeo4w install process, user can
not install both 2.8 and 2.10?
They can install qgis (2.10, release-2_10 branch), qgis-ltr (2.8.x, release-2_8
branch) and qgis-dev (2.11, master branch) in
Hi!
I have previously been able to use the QGIS plugin QuickWKT to conveniently
visualize geometries in QGIS. This has worked well using both 2D and 3D data
where only the 2D part has been visualized. Recently I haven't been able to
insert WKT polygons with Z-values.
I have tried the
Am Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:03:47 +0200
schrieb Jürgen E. Fischer j...@norbit.de:
Hi people,
the new version was just branched off, the new tar ball[1] was made and
packaging can begin and the feature freeze on master is now over.
The new version will be announced once packages for some
Hello,
now that the feature freeze is over, can somebody please merge the QGIS
server refactoring PR?
This would bring python bindings for the server library and python tests
for QGIS server.
A first python test is already in the PR but more test can be added once
the refactoring is merged.
Hi all,
While executing Osgeo4w in Advanced Install mode to update/upgrade all my
QGIS versions, it offers me to install 2.10 at the place of 2.8. As 2.8 is
a Long Term Release, I think it should be kept till another LTR and 2.10
should have a new entry.
Am I wrong?
Hi,
On Mon, 29. Jun 2015 at 09:49:26 +0200, DelazJ wrote:
While executing Osgeo4w in Advanced Install mode to update/upgrade all my
QGIS versions, it offers me to install 2.10 at the place of 2.8. As 2.8 is
a Long Term Release, I think it should be kept till another LTR and 2.10
should have
I do know. Does it mean that, still through osgeo4w install process, user
can not install both 2.8 and 2.10?
I don't get what I should see in the download page. All still refers to 2.8
(unless I have a cache issue on my browser)
2015-06-29 10:00 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de:
Hi,
On
2015-06-29 10:27 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de:
Hi,
On Mon, 29. Jun 2015 at 10:13:53 +0200, DelazJ wrote:
I do know. Does it mean that, still through osgeo4w install process,
user can
not install both 2.8 and 2.10?
They can install qgis (2.10, release-2_10 branch), qgis-ltr (2.8.x,
Hi all.
Just upgraded from standard repo, on Debian sid. I consistently get a
segafault when starting normally. No segfault when from a clean
configpath. No message froom the console. I have a lot of settings and
plugins, so bisecting would take a long time. Any hint on how to debug this?
Thanks.
On 06/30/2015 07:44 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Just upgraded from standard repo, on Debian sid. I consistently get a
segafault when starting normally. No segfault when from a clean
configpath. No message froom the console. I have a lot of settings and
plugins, so bisecting would take a long
20 matches
Mail list logo
