Dear QGIS community,
In the last few years we have been steadily improving the amount of funding
we are able to accumulate in the QGIS project. Our goal in obtaining funding
is always to 'make QGIS better'. Up until now we have focussed funding on
high profile aspects of the project: Funding regul
Is it Geometry Checker replacement for Topology Checker? It has more
options but does not support multiple layers. What is the future,
Geometry Checker or Topology Checker or both merged together?
Radim
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@list
+1
Great initiative!!! we really need an uptodate documentation...
2015-10-05 9:07 GMT+02:00 Otto Dassau :
> Dear QGIS community,
>
> In the last few years we have been steadily improving the amount of funding
> we are able to accumulate in the QGIS project. Our goal in obtaining
> funding
> is a
Il 05/10/2015 12:52, DelazJ ha scritto:
> +1
> Great initiative!!! we really need an uptodate documentation...
Of course, donations and sponsorship from users will greatly speed up
the process. So please those who need an updated documentation, come and
help!
https://www.qgis.org/en/site/about/spo
On Monday, October 05, 2015 13:23:44 Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 05/10/2015 12:52, DelazJ ha scritto:
> > +1
> > Great initiative!!! we really need an uptodate documentation...
>
> Of course, donations and sponsorship from users will greatly speed up
> the process. So please those who need an upda
Thanks very much Larry!
Regards
Tim
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Larry Shaffer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Mac nightly of master branch for 10.7 - 10.10 (maybe 10.11, too) has
> been updated and is ready for beta testing the upcoming 2.12 release.
>
> http://qgis.dakotacarto.com/
>
> Note: the Mac
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> some tests of the new plugin:
> * G6 vectors are shown with a red cross,
And the name is followed by "topology version 6", right?
> but there is no clear indication on how to migrate them to G7
What do you suggest? My idea was
Il 05/10/2015 14:44, Radim Blazek ha scritto:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> * G6 vectors are shown with a red cross,
>
> And the name is followed by "topology version 6", right?
exactly
> What do you suggest? My idea was "Build topology" item in context
> menu. Bu
Il 05/10/2015 14:58, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
> I think the context menu is fine, and adding it should not be an issue
> now (I could say not being able to readily use my data is a bug, and
> your suggestion fixes it).
the procedure described in the wiki works smoothly from the embedded
GRASS
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>>> * G6 vectors are shown with a red cross,
>>
>> And the name is followed by "topology version 6", right?
>
> exactly
>
>> What do you suggest? My idea was "Build topology" item in context
>> menu. But we are over feature freeze and if someb
Il 05/10/2015 17:18, Radim Blazek ha scritto:
> OK, but first I have to fix other bugs.
sure - should I open a ticket then?
> There is v.build.all in modules.
yes, but the user has no hint about its necessity; further steps:
db.connect -d
v.db.reconnect.all -cd
are not available among modules (
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 05/10/2015 17:18, Radim Blazek ha scritto:
>
>> OK, but first I have to fix other bugs.
>
> sure - should I open a ticket then?
Yes, thanks.
>> There is v.build.all in modules.
>
> yes, but the user has no hint about its necessity; furt
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Radim Blazek wrote:
> >> There is v.build.all in modules.
> >
> > yes, but the user has no hint about its necessity; further steps:
> > db.connect -d
> > v.db.reconnect.all -cd
> > are not available among modules (BTW, maybe these options could be added
> > to exis
Il 05/10/2015 19:16, Radim Blazek ha scritto:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> Il 05/10/2015 17:18, Radim Blazek ha scritto:
>>
>>> OK, but first I have to fix other bugs.
>>
>> sure - should I open a ticket then?
>
> Yes, thanks.
done: https://hub.qgis.org/issues/1352
Il 05/10/2015 17:18, Radim Blazek ha scritto:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> yes - I tried, but the newly added polygon etc is not displayed once
>> digitized. Oh, now I see: the custom grass symbology prevents me from
>> seeing it. Once moved to single symbol, it is
15 matches
Mail list logo
