Morning,
I've put the changes together for these features. This is my first
contribution, so I wondered if I could check that I'm making the pull
request properly. Hopefully make it a bit easier for whoever deals with it.
I ran the changes through prepare-commit.sh which fixed a few formattin
On 30 Dec 2015 8:08 PM, "Duncan" wrote:
>
> Morning,
>
> I've put the changes together for these features. This is my first
> contribution, so I wondered if I could check that I'm making the pull request
> properly. Hopefully make it a bit easier for whoever deals with it.
Sounds great - and mu
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 09:07:59AM +, Duncan wrote:
> Morning,
>
> I've put the changes together for these features. This is my first
> contribution, so I wondered if I could check that I'm making the pull
> request properly. Hopefully make it a bit easier for whoever deals with it.
>
Thanks for the info Nyall.
I'll get the pull request setup and see what comes back.
I've had a look at the test writing guidance on the site and have a rough idea
of what to do, so I'll start getting them sorted while I wait for feedback on
the pull request. If I get stuck I'll let you know.
Hi,
I am experiencing cross heap contamination with OSGEO4W64. The issue causes
apps using QgsApplication to crash unless the application is built with VS
2010 in Release configuration.
I have tried VS 2008, VS 2013, and VS 2010. Only Release mode in VS 2010
will run without crash.
Debug mode in VS
Hi
I add a virtual field to a layer with e.g. following expression
attribute(get_feature('pnf_pnf','t_id',afrom),'year')
This works really great. Then I'm using this new virtual field for
filtering the features in the rule based renderer. How does affect this the
rendering performance? It seems
Hi Médéric,
Sorry, I saw Nyall's reply and somehow missed yours.
The pull request is in...and passed the CI which is nice.
I've attached a screen shot of the UI changes.
I, like you, don't think this is exactly a critical feature, but nice to
have. I don't think it breaks any old projects. We
On 31 Dec 2015 2:01 AM, "Stefan Ziegler"
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I add a virtual field to a layer with e.g. following expression
>
> attribute(get_feature('pnf_pnf','t_id',afrom),'year')
>
> This works really great. Then I'm using this new virtual field for
filtering the features in the rule based rende
Hi Nyall
I compared 2.12 with current master. But I don't see an improvement.
Opening the attribute table takes around 10 seconds for layers with approx.
2000 features with one virtual field (with the attribute(get_feature())
expression). Rendering is also really slow when using rule based rendere
Why not using joined fields ? Caching mechanism already exists there.
Le mer. 30 déc. 2015 8:18 PM, Stefan Ziegler
a écrit :
> Hi Nyall
>
> I compared 2.12 with current master. But I don't see an improvement.
> Opening the attribute table takes around 10 seconds for layers with approx.
> 2000 fe
On 31 December 2015 at 06:18, Stefan Ziegler
wrote:
> Hi Nyall
>
> I compared 2.12 with current master. But I don't see an improvement. Opening
> the attribute table takes around 10 seconds for layers with approx. 2000
> features with one virtual field (with the attribute(get_feature())
> expressi
Thanks for the hint. This works perfect. But: the main idea was to avoid
creating "new" fields in the layer (virtual fields or joined ones) but only
using the expression for rendering.
Stefan
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Denis Rouzaud
wrote:
> Why not using joined fields ? Caching mechanism
Hi all,
The email chain below is just one example of a user who has issues
with QGIS after installing the OpenLayers plugin. Stackexchange is
filled with similar examples (See
http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/qgis-openlayers-plugin).
I'm wondering if it's time we discussed the future
Two postgres layers with an index on the fields.
Do I see some debug messages (when compiled with DEBUG)?
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Nyall Dawson
wrote:
> On 31 December 2015 at 06:18, Stefan Ziegler
> wrote:
> > Hi Nyall
> >
> > I compared 2.12 with current master. But I don't see an im
I think deprecation and removal would be good, but for a tangential reason:
the name conflicts with OpenLayers the web mapping library. A trivial reason
at best, but probably irritating to many, and potentially confusing to
users.
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabbl
Hi Stuart,
On Wed, 30. Dec 2015 at 07:43:13 -0700, Stuart Brittain wrote:
> I have tried VS 2008, VS 2013, and VS 2010. Only Release mode in VS 2010
> will run without crash.
> Debug mode in VS 2010 will also crash, and the application cannot be
> debugged.
Use RelWithDebInfo in VS 2010 if you wa
If the plugin is deprecated, what is replacing it? I find the plugin to be very
useful.
-Original Message-
From: Qgis-developer [mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf
Of Tom Chadwin
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 5:46 PM
To: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Subject:
On 31 December 2015 at 13:29, Joshua Quesenberry wrote:
> If the plugin is deprecated, what is replacing it? I find the plugin to be
> very useful.
QuickMapServices. It's got numerous improvements over OpenLayers,
including reprojection support and not breaking the map composer.
Nyall
>
> --
As a non-developer if I can chip in my .02 cents worth - I think
deprecating it might be a good thing. To me it was always a plugin that
received a lot of applause - but the one that would cause the most
questions ("why can't I use this imagery in map composer"). While I
liked having access to
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 22:42:27 -0500
Randal Hale wrote:
> As a non-developer if I can chip in my .02 cents worth - I think
> deprecating it might be a good thing. To me it was always a plugin
> that received a lot of applause - but the one that would cause the
> most questions ("why can't I use th
Deprecating it makes sense to me, unless authors plan to fix the long standing
issues.
Thanks for raising this.
All the best.
Il 31 dicembre 2015 06:47:08 CET, h ha scritto:
>On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 22:42:27 -0500
>Randal Hale wrote:
>
>> As a non-developer if I can chip in my .02 cents worth - I t
21 matches
Mail list logo
