Hi,
Is there anything on the plugin repo wiki page that we still need? I
reviewed it and it seems pretty much outdated:
http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/wiki/PluginRepository
It also mentions "trusted" users, which causes confusion with our current
effort to establish trusted plugin
Hi everyone!
Hope you made it back home safe after Bonn. Could you give a short update
on this topic, what was discussed / decided / worked on in Bonn?
Thank you and best wishes,
Anita
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016
Hi Casper
On 08/30/2016 02:59 PM, Casper Børgesen (CABO) wrote:
> Hi Nathan
>
>
>
> Thanks for clarifying that, I’ll try to put my faith in the layer. My
> question is then, why does the layer only respond with 2 features when I
> ask it for max 3 features, since 4 – 1 = 3?
>
I guess (no
Hi Nathan
Thanks for clarifying that, I’ll try to put my faith in the layer. My question
is then, why does the layer only respond with 2 features when I ask it for max
3 features, since 4 – 1 = 3?
Does it find 3 features, determine that one of them has been deleted and only
returns the two
If you haven't saved the layer after you did the delete the provider still
thinks there is 4 features. The layer itself and the edit buffer sit above
the data provider.
Generally you should trust the layer as it knows the state of the edit
buffer.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Casper
Hi,
I have a point SHAPE layer with 4 points on a line (just to make them easy to
number in this example, and the layer is created in QGIS).
1. Start editing.
2. Delete point number 3.
3. In the python console do the following:
>>>
Plugin PDF Filler approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1092] PDF Filler 0.1 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/PDF_Filler/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Hi
On 30.08.2016 13:42, Björn Harrtell wrote:
> I'm willing to do more I agree it should involve more than one person
Maybe you didn't see Tudor's mail volounteering for help:
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2016-August/044271.html
Cheers
Marco
--
Marco Bernasocchi
OPENGIS.ch
Plugin Azimuth and Distance Plugin approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[189] Azimuth and Distance Plugin 0.9.7" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/qgsAzimuth/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Plugin SEC4QGIS approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1086] SEC4QGIS 1.0.2" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/SEC4QGIS/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
2016-08-29 22:43 GMT+02:00 Matthias Kuhn :
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 08/29/2016 09:47 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
> > On 29-08-16 21:07, Björn Harrtell wrote:
> >> Seems to exist a comprehensive tool to migrate Redmine issues to GitLab
> >> issues:
> >>
2016-08-30 8:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Duivenvoorde :
> On 29-08-16 22:43, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>
> > * I think he was talking about GitLab
>
> Ah oops, sorry. The work stays the same probably :-(
It does seem like a difficult task, but with GitLab you do not have to use
a
Qt can be a bit picky at times. Nothing has changed between 2.14 and 2.16
to effect that.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Geo DrinX wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> 2016-08-30 12:24 GMT+02:00 Nathan Woodrow :
>
>> Works fine for me here on Windows.
>>
>
> Yes.
Hi Nathan,
2016-08-30 12:24 GMT+02:00 Nathan Woodrow :
> Works fine for me here on Windows.
>
Yes. Now it works also to me. :)
But, what happens here :
https://youtu.be/rjrRMEKrQ2Y
Where I wrong, in my actions in video ?
Misterious. BTW, now it works.
Thank you
Hi,
I noticed that from 2.16 version I cannot "dock" the floating palettes,
that is I can not get back inside the QGIS interface edges. Has anyone else
noticed this strange behavior? It just happens to me?
Thank you
Roberto
___
Qgis-developer mailing
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:54:15PM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
> Thanks Greg and others who have commented on this thread. I would just
> mention again that the discussion of hosting platforms is moot without an
> accompanying offer to migrate our issue database to the new platform
FYI: the
On 29-08-16 22:43, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> * I think he was talking about GitLab
Ah oops, sorry. The work stays the same probably :-(
> * The new GitHub API allows pushing by issue rather than comment. So
> that brings it down to ~16000 requests.
Those throtteling api is pretty frustrating to
17 matches
Mail list logo