Hi,
QGIS Server is being deeply refactored, and the new implementation is
described in https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74
and: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/3866
The current implementation has some limited caching of the capabilities
(taken from the project .qgs fil
I want to raise this discussion again.
Currently in Processing we have two kinds of algorithm providers:
- providers which are available in all major platforms out of the box
(e.g. GDAL, GRASS, maybe SAGA and OTB)
- "special" providers which require user to install additional components
(R, TauDEM
Dear list,
I am currently evaluating QGIS Server as rendering backend for my new
project; can you give me some insight in the architecture / implementation?
To pose my question more specific: with QGIS Server being a fcgi
application, what data (e.g. parsed .qgs file?) is retained and/or freeing
o
Plugin GhiniTreePositioner approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1155] GhiniTreePositioner 0.2 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/DistanceMatrixToCoords/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Lis
Hi Lene,
> We both use SGAS 2.1.2
the "gdal_mrsid" error can be safely ingnored, see for example
https://sourceforge.net/p/saga-gis/support-requests/9/
Please post the full log that the tool returns and/or post sample data
and/or try see of the user has an old Processing installed inside
.qgis
Il 07/01/2017 15:08, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
> What would be nice is if we had the next hackfest just before the
> planned feature freeze. So we could discuss in person if there's a
> reason to postpone feature freeze by a couple of days/weeks.
>
> Something like:
>
> * hackfest mid-april
> *
Plugin GhiniTreePositioner approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1155] GhiniTreePositioner 0.1 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/DistanceMatrixToCoords/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Lis