[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1239] Senscape approval notification.

Plugin Senscape approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1239] Senscape 0.1 Experimental" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/senscape/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Displaying CRS in the spatial bookmarks

On 16 May 2017 at 20:32, Alexander Bruy wrote: > Hi devs, > > when spatial bookmark created along with coordinates it also store > CRS. But instead > of human-readable format (e.g. EPSG code) an internal SRS ID is used, > see [0]. Is > this intentionally? Should we store

[QGIS-Developer] Osgeo4w: missing dependency?

Hi all, an advanced install with Osgeo4w complains for a missing xerces-c 3. Selecting it by hand solves the issue, so I suspect it is a missing declared dependency. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html

Re: [QGIS-Developer] editbuffet::commitChanges limitations found working on #15741... suggestions?

solution 1 works also for 3.x Luigi Pirelli ** * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli * Stackexchange:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] editbuffet::commitChanges limitations found working on #15741... suggestions?

the issue affects qgis3 too Luigi Pirelli ** * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli * Stackexchange:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] OTB 6 and Processing

On 16 May 2017 at 19:40, Ricardo Filipe Soares Garcia da wrote: > It's looking great :) > > Having processing algs run in the background will really improve the user > experience IMO. > > Having the possibility to use expressions in order to define parameters >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] editbuffet::commitChanges limitations found working on #15741... suggestions?

just a short note, solution 1) fix tre issue without introduction more regression tests (btw coverage is poor in this area) Luigi Pirelli ** * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT

[QGIS-Developer] Displaying CRS in the spatial bookmarks

Hi devs, when spatial bookmark created along with coordinates it also store CRS. But instead of human-readable format (e.g. EPSG code) an internal SRS ID is used, see [0]. Is this intentionally? Should we store EPSG code instead? [0] https://issues.qgis.org/issues/14393 -- Alexander Bruy

Re: [QGIS-Developer] OTB 6 and Processing

It's looking great :) Having processing algs run in the background will really improve the user experience IMO. Having the possibility to use expressions in order to define parameters dynamically is really awesome too! In your video demo you effectively turned the fixed distance buffer algorithm

[QGIS-Developer] editbuffet::commitChanges limitations found working on #15741... suggestions?

Hi (especially MarcoH) Analysis: working on #15741 [1] I found that the the issue is comes mainly from the following commit: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/8d70a5141b0f56c40fc19e32d5d55475e22ec10f and secondary from:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] OTB 6 and Processing

On 16 May 2017 at 18:16, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 16/05/2017 10:08, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto: >> Hello Paolo, >> >> Is the processing plugin ported to c++? or just the core part with >> wrappers in python? > > core in C++, with Python bindings. Nyall can be more

Re: [QGIS-Developer] OTB 6 and Processing

Users of QGIS 2.x don't need separate plugin as OTB and all other providers are part of Processing. 2017-05-16 11:16 GMT+03:00 Paolo Cavallini : > Il 16/05/2017 10:08, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto: >> Hello Paolo, >> >> Is the processing plugin ported to c++? or just the core

Re: [QGIS-Developer] OTB 6 and Processing

Il 16/05/2017 10:08, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto: > Hello Paolo, > > Is the processing plugin ported to c++? or just the core part with > wrappers in python? core in C++, with Python bindings. Nyall can be more precise on this. > I am not clear on that. And this change will be for qgis3, users

Re: [QGIS-Developer] priority bugs query

Sorry for the mail sent to the list hthat was meant only for Sandro, cheers! -- G -- 2017-05-16 9:01 GMT+01:00 Giovanni Manghi : > > Ciao Sandro, > > c'é un thread ufficiale in lista PSC nel quale comunicare la volontá di > lavorare su qualche ticket, > cin sono

Re: [QGIS-Developer] priority bugs query

Ciao Sandro, c'é un thread ufficiale in lista PSC nel quale comunicare la volontá di lavorare su qualche ticket, cin sono anche i link diretti ai dticket per vedere se un developer ha aggounto qualche commento, si é aseegnato il ticket o l'ha taggato come "in progress". Se hai intenzione di

[QGIS-Developer] priority bugs query

Hi Giovanni. I'm starting with the 2.18 bugfix work and have been told to use this document as a list of priorities to be fixed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1frZQU8bwGX499WMvtOc6GDIWqEuSv3QHz3zc90TS46Q/edit#gid=0 As it isn't easy to tell which of those bugs is being already worked on,