Plugin Senscape approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1239] Senscape 0.1 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/senscape/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
On 16 May 2017 at 20:32, Alexander Bruy wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> when spatial bookmark created along with coordinates it also store
> CRS. But instead
> of human-readable format (e.g. EPSG code) an internal SRS ID is used,
> see [0]. Is
> this intentionally? Should we store
Hi all,
an advanced install with Osgeo4w complains for a missing xerces-c 3.
Selecting it by hand solves the issue, so I suspect it is a missing
declared dependency.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
solution 1 works also for 3.x
Luigi Pirelli
**
* Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Stackexchange:
the issue affects qgis3 too
Luigi Pirelli
**
* Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Stackexchange:
On 16 May 2017 at 19:40, Ricardo Filipe Soares Garcia da
wrote:
> It's looking great :)
>
> Having processing algs run in the background will really improve the user
> experience IMO.
>
> Having the possibility to use expressions in order to define parameters
>
just a short note, solution 1) fix tre issue without introduction more
regression tests (btw coverage is poor in this area)
Luigi Pirelli
**
* Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT
Hi devs,
when spatial bookmark created along with coordinates it also store
CRS. But instead
of human-readable format (e.g. EPSG code) an internal SRS ID is used,
see [0]. Is
this intentionally? Should we store EPSG code instead?
[0] https://issues.qgis.org/issues/14393
--
Alexander Bruy
It's looking great :)
Having processing algs run in the background will really improve the user
experience IMO.
Having the possibility to use expressions in order to define parameters
dynamically is really awesome too! In your video demo you effectively
turned the fixed distance buffer algorithm
Hi (especially MarcoH)
Analysis:
working on #15741 [1] I found that the the issue is comes mainly from
the following commit:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/8d70a5141b0f56c40fc19e32d5d55475e22ec10f
and secondary from:
On 16 May 2017 at 18:16, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 16/05/2017 10:08, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto:
>> Hello Paolo,
>>
>> Is the processing plugin ported to c++? or just the core part with
>> wrappers in python?
>
> core in C++, with Python bindings. Nyall can be more
Users of QGIS 2.x don't need separate plugin as OTB and all
other providers are part of Processing.
2017-05-16 11:16 GMT+03:00 Paolo Cavallini :
> Il 16/05/2017 10:08, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto:
>> Hello Paolo,
>>
>> Is the processing plugin ported to c++? or just the core
Il 16/05/2017 10:08, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto:
> Hello Paolo,
>
> Is the processing plugin ported to c++? or just the core part with
> wrappers in python?
core in C++, with Python bindings. Nyall can be more precise on this.
> I am not clear on that. And this change will be for qgis3, users
Sorry for the mail sent to the list hthat was meant only for Sandro,
cheers!
-- G --
2017-05-16 9:01 GMT+01:00 Giovanni Manghi :
>
> Ciao Sandro,
>
> c'é un thread ufficiale in lista PSC nel quale comunicare la volontá di
> lavorare su qualche ticket,
> cin sono
Ciao Sandro,
c'é un thread ufficiale in lista PSC nel quale comunicare la volontá di
lavorare su qualche ticket,
cin sono anche i link diretti ai dticket per vedere se un developer ha
aggounto qualche commento, si é aseegnato
il ticket o l'ha taggato come "in progress".
Se hai intenzione di
Hi Giovanni.
I'm starting with the 2.18 bugfix work and have been told to use this
document as a list of priorities to be fixed:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1frZQU8bwGX499WMvtOc6GDIWqEuSv3QHz3zc90TS46Q/edit#gid=0
As it isn't easy to tell which of those bugs is being already worked
on,
16 matches
Mail list logo