Hi Nyall,
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> On 10 June 2017 at 06:46, Giovanni Manghi wrote:
>>> * Aspect throws an error:
>>
>>
>> is this GDAL's aspect?
>
> No - native QGIS one. None of the GDAL/OGR provider is ported to the
> new API yet and is not available in nightly
On 10 June 2017 at 06:46, Giovanni Manghi wrote:
>> * Aspect throws an error:
>
>
> is this GDAL's aspect?
No - native QGIS one. None of the GDAL/OGR provider is ported to the
new API yet and is not available in nightly builds.
> is expected that -for example- all the tools, even not QGIS native
> * Aspect throws an error:
is this GDAL's aspect?
is expected that -for example- all the tools, even not QGIS native
ones to be somehow fixed in processing/QGIS3 because of the overhaul
that is going on? If yes this is also true for Processing plugins that
make uses of external programs like ogr
Hi all,
I did some testing of new Processing commands, on a freshly compiled QGIS.
* Aspect throws an error:
{'INPUT_LAYER': ,
'OUTPUT_LAYER': , 'Z_FACTOR': 1.0}
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/src/qgis/QGIS/build_qgis3/output/python/plugins/processing/gui/Postprocessing.py",
Several weeks ago I had proposed a geodesic measure tool that also includes
the bearing from point A to B and bearing from B to A. Nyall suggested that
this capability be added to the QGIS measure tool. The question is would
you want this with the QGIS measure tool or should it be a separate plugin
Plugin Shape Tools approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1193] Shape Tools 0.4.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/shapetools/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman
Where does QGIS stand on supporting parallel processing/OpenCL/CUDA? About a
year ago, I opened a ticket about using OpenCL/CUDA in QGIS,
https://issues.qgis.org/issues/14680, but it was closed almost immediately.
The suggestion was to solve this outside of QGIS. Is that really all there
is to it?
Thanks a lot ! No more confusion with N or 1/N scales definition !
2017-06-09 9:42 GMT+02:00 Tim Sutton :
> Thanks for the report back and the great work Nyall!
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Paolo Cavallini
> wrote:
>
>> Il 09/06/2017 08:54, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
>>
2017-06-09 8:31 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini :
>
>
> BTW, wouldn't this be the right time to change the colour scheme? To me
> the old one (red for normal, blue for selected, green for errors, pink
> for snapped) is non standard and counter-intuitive.
> The normal semaphore schema (green for normal,
On 09-06-17 03:42, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> Instead of a toggle, could we use some logic like:
>
> - no selection: edit all clicked features
> - selection, but no selected features exist where clicked: edit all
> clicked features
> - selection, where selected features exist where clicked: edit ONLY
>
Hi Rashad,
let's move this discussion to QGIS dev list.
2017-06-08 20:00 GMT+03:00 Rashad Kanavath :
> With new improvements in OTB plugin there is no need to update stuff for
> each release. It work same like GRASS GIS.
> the descriptor files will be generated depending on user's OTB version. IT
Thanks for the report back and the great work Nyall!
Regards
Tim
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Paolo Cavallini
wrote:
> Il 09/06/2017 08:54, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
>
> > Just a quick notice to advise that the work sponsored by the QGIS
> > grant program on "adding consistency to UI control
Il 09/06/2017 08:54, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
> Just a quick notice to advise that the work sponsored by the QGIS
> grant program on "adding consistency to UI controls" is now complete
> and merged into master. The following tasks were done as part of this
> work:
Great stuff, thaks heaps!
--
P
13 matches
Mail list logo
