Re: [QGIS-Developer] Suggestion for changelog entry about default values

Hello Etienne, I've tried it now, but after clicking Submit I got an error about "too many redirects" and now I can't see the entry anymore at all. Strange. Regards, Daan 2018-02-22 7:52 GMT+01:00 Etienne Trimaille : > Hi Daan, > > You should be able to create an

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Suggestion for changelog entry about default values

Hi Daan, You should be able to create an account on changelog.qgis.org and then edit the entry. Then it will go in the pending queue for a review. Contributions on the changelog are more than welcome, there is a lot of work to do ;-) Thanks for your contribution. Regards, Etienne 2018-02-22

[QGIS-Developer] Suggestion for changelog entry about default values

Hello, As per the discussion of this bug report: https://issues.qgis.org/issues/17990, could a text be added to this changelog entry: http://changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/version/3.0.0/#improved-handling-of-defaults ? For example: "This also means that, after certain editing operations (e.g.

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Concerns re UX of new "duplicate features" actions in 2.99

On 22 February 2018 at 07:15, David Signer wrote: > Hi Nyall > > It's okay for me, when you merge it to be save and we remove it, when the > issue is resolved. > > But I'll remove the part that the duplicate functions toggles the edit mode > anyway. > So in case there will be

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Concerns re UX of new "duplicate features" actions in 2.99

Hi Nyall It's okay for me, when you merge it to be save and we remove it, when the issue is resolved. But I'll remove the part that the duplicate functions toggles the edit mode anyway. So in case there will be still the action to duplicate on a not editable layer somewhere (what

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Concerns re UX of new "duplicate features" actions in 2.99

Hi Dave, hi Nyall, Thanks for all your thoughts and work on this. The approach that is currently being developed sounds like a very reasonable one given the remaining time for 3.0. Another idea I had to handle things like this was an "activate condition" for actions. The activate condition for

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Concerns re UX of new "duplicate features" actions in 2.99

On 22 February 2018 at 00:55, David Signer wrote: > We could keep it as an Action, only enabled when the layer is editable. > This would include an attribute of MapLayerAction, if it should be enabled > only in editable mode or always (first case for the duplication-action).

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Concerns re UX of new "duplicate features" actions in 2.99

On 22 February 2018 at 06:20, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > On 02/21/2018 08:55 PM, Nyall Dawson wrote: >> On 22 February 2018 at 05:24, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >>> Hi Dave, hi Nyall, >>> >>> Thanks for all your thoughts and work on this. The approach that is >>>

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Concerns re UX of new "duplicate features" actions in 2.99

On 02/21/2018 08:55 PM, Nyall Dawson wrote: > On 22 February 2018 at 05:24, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >> Hi Dave, hi Nyall, >> >> Thanks for all your thoughts and work on this. The approach that is >> currently being developed sounds like a very reasonable one given the >>

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Concerns re UX of new "duplicate features" actions in 2.99

On 22 February 2018 at 05:24, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > Hi Dave, hi Nyall, > > Thanks for all your thoughts and work on this. The approach that is > currently being developed sounds like a very reasonable one given the > remaining time for 3.0. > In the meantime, I'd like to

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog site upgrade

Hi > On 21 Feb 2018, at 19:18, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > > On 21-02-18 17:01, Martin Dobias wrote: >> Hi Tim >> >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Tim Sutton > > wrote: >> >>Hi >> >>Thanks you for your patience -

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Sluggish on MacOS 10.13 with Retina Display

Hi Nyall, On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 6:51 PM, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > > I'm just saying that there's nothing QGIS specific there - so there's > no clues there wherever it's a generic Qt issue or a QGIS regression. > I'm using xcode's instruments, but I've never really

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog site upgrade

On 21-02-18 17:01, Martin Dobias wrote: > Hi Tim > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Tim Sutton > wrote: > > Hi > > Thanks you for your patience - the server upgrade is complete and > changelog is back online. Please feel free to help

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog site upgrade

Hi Tim On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Tim Sutton wrote: > Hi > > Thanks you for your patience - the server upgrade is complete and > changelog is back online. Please feel free to help work on the changelog > for the release! > > Thanks for the update! Just wondering, is

[QGIS-Developer] Data defined @symbol_color outlines

Hi List This issue (https://issues.qgis.org/issues/15132) refers to using the @symbol_color function to make the outline of graduated/categorised features the same colour as the fill. There is a fix by Nyall from over a year ago but I wonder if there has been a regression? I am using both

[QGIS-Developer] keyPressEvent on QgsMapTool

Hi devs, I am using an object derived by QgsMapTool class (python, qgis 2.18 on window). I need to use the keyPressEvent function of QgsMapTool. I cannot receive any event if I press some keys for example “a”, “c”, “d”, “p”, “x”, “y” keys. The other keys works fine. Is there anybody who can

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Concerns re UX of new "duplicate features" actions in 2.99

Hi Nyall I'll start with it today. So possibly it's done before the 23th. We could keep it as an Action, only enabled when the layer is editable. This would include an attribute of MapLayerAction, if it should be enabled only in editable mode or always (first case for the

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1416] Breeder Map approval notification.

Plugin Breeder Map approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1416] Breeder Map 0.1 Experimental" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/BreederMap/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog site upgrade

Hi Thanks you for your patience - the server upgrade is complete and changelog is back online. Please feel free to help work on the changelog for the release! Regards Tim > On 21 Feb 2018, at 12:10, Tim Sutton wrote: > > Hi All > > NOTICE: ESPECIALLY FOR THOSE WORKING ON

Re: [QGIS-Developer] External providers in QGIS

Hi Rashad Thanks so much for your email below….sometimes things are not always easy to figure out, especially as QGIS gets bigger and more complex. We will really value your contribution as we move forward … and we will try to come up with a solution that works well for everyone. Best regards

[QGIS-Developer] Future of Processing algs Help panel

Hi all, Now that all the algorithms are documented in the User manual I'd like to raise discussion on the status of the Help panel shown in algorithm dialog. Depending on the algs (I'm here talking only about QGIS algorithms), we have different status: - provides an uptodate help - provides a

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Call for possible vote on change to official plugin repo policy?

Il 21/02/2018 10:59, Tim Sutton ha scritto: >> On 21 Feb 2018, at 09:01, Paolo Cavallini > > wrote: >> >> as plugin manager, I'd appreciate this enormously; I wish there was a >> clear policy, with no room for interpretation. Having >= 1

[QGIS-Developer] Changelog site upgrade

Hi All NOTICE: ESPECIALLY FOR THOSE WORKING ON THE CHANGELOG AT THE HACKFEST... We are going to push out some changes to the live changelog site this afternoon - the site will be unavailable (hopefully just for a few minutes) while I do the upgrade. The upgrade will happen at 12h45 Madeira

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Recordings of Developer Meetup Sessions?

Hi Matt > On 21 Feb 2018, at 02:59, Matt Kenny wrote: > > Hello - > > I just saw a post from Tim Sutton regarding the Developer Meeting [1] > starting tomorrow. Will the sessions that have zoom meeting links be recorded > and made available to watch later? Yes I do

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Call for possible vote on change to official plugin repo policy?

Hi > On 21 Feb 2018, at 09:01, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > > Hi Nyall, > > Il 21/02/2018 06:55, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: >> On 19 February 2018 at 17:46, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > >>> I fully understand and support your concerns. Why not simply

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Order of algorithms in processing

@Borys, Yes this is what happens, thanks. Jakob - Jakob Lanstorp -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: