Plugin Geodyn gemeente approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1444] Geodyn gemeente 0.3 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/GeodynGem/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https
Plugin Geodyn gemeente approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1444] Geodyn gemeente 0.3 Experimental" is now unapproved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/GeodynGem/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: htt
Plugin Geodyn gemeente approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1444] Geodyn gemeente 0.3 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/GeodynGem/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https
Plugin iso4app approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1409] iso4app 0.6 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/iso4app/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org
jHi all,
to go in the same direction as Andreas, my opinion is that the three
relational widgets (value relation, relation reference, and 0-n/n-m one)
need some love and I was about to start redacting a global QEP for that.
There are a lot of features missing and glitches we would like to adress,
Hi,
Yes indeed, there is a large overlap between the two and it would be
nice to unite them in the future.
Most of the recent work has gone into the relation reference widget, but
unfortunately there are still some things that will need to be
implemented on the relation reference widget before th