[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1355] QRealTime approval notification.

2018-06-04 Thread noreply
Plugin QRealTime approval by zimbogisgeek. The plugin version "[1355] QRealTime 3.1.0" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/QRealTime/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1095] AnnotationManager approval notification.

2018-06-04 Thread noreply
Plugin AnnotationManager approval by zimbogisgeek. The plugin version "[1095] AnnotationManager 0.4 Experimental" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/annotationManager/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1439] Append Features to Layer approval notification.

2018-06-04 Thread noreply
Plugin Append Features to Layer approval by zimbogisgeek. The plugin version "[1439] Append Features to Layer 0.2.0" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/AppendFeaturesToLayer/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1214] Open eQuarter approval notification.

2018-06-04 Thread noreply
Plugin Open eQuarter approval by zimbogisgeek. The plugin version "[1214] Open eQuarter 0.998g" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/mole/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

2018-06-04 Thread Matthias Kuhn
I see, there is a lot of Tim's good will involved in this tool. This is much appreciated! Thanks for approving, Régis. Cheers Matthias On 06/04/2018 05:18 PM, Régis Haubourg wrote: > Hi Matthias, I approved 3 pending entries for you . > The current Projecta workflow makes entries disappear when

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

2018-06-04 Thread Régis Haubourg
Hi Matthias, I approved 3 pending entries for you . The current Projecta workflow makes entries disappear when you submit them, and one with privileges must approve it (Tim, Richard and I, IIRC) I agree this is surprising and suboptimal, but we rely on Tim's efforts for having projecta, which is

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

2018-06-04 Thread Matthias Kuhn
Thanks Etienne and Richard, I am aware that there is a documentation hook in place. I was under the impression that in the past new changelogs where pre-populated with commit messages containing [FEATURE] and I just had to fill the details and add others that were missing. But if you say it, I

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

2018-06-04 Thread Etienne Trimaille
These commits are added to the QGIS-Documentation issue tracker, but not in the QGIS changelog. Developers should do it themselves with the form. We don't create always one changelog entry per feature, for instance with new expressions, we create only one entry in the changelog referencing all new

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

2018-06-04 Thread Richard Duivenvoorde
Nope, nothing is added automagically... What we have is a githook which adds an issue in the documentation issue list when a QGIS commit msg contains [FEATURE]: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues Developers, Funders or just normal users have to add features for the Changelog

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

2018-06-04 Thread Matthias Kuhn
Hi, interesting, even those commits tagged with [FEATURE] are not in the changelog, if I am not wrong, those were added automatically in the past. Matthias On 06/04/2018 04:08 PM, DelazJ wrote: > Hi, > > Is it normal that http://changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/version/3.2.0/ > provides only 5 new

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

2018-06-04 Thread DelazJ
Hi, Is it normal that http://changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/version/3.2.0/ provides only 5 new features? Harrissou 2018-03-03 12:15 GMT+01:00 Richard Duivenvoorde : > On 03-03-18 08:33, Tim Sutton wrote: > > >> I'm not sure if it's an issue with my projecta account, but I can't > >> access the

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Crash with QgsAuthManager() in 3.x

2018-06-04 Thread Luigi Pirelli
as far as I know/remember, nothing is changed from the AuthManager point of view... only the sigleton has been moved as wrote by Nyall, as most of singleton. Luigi Pirelli ** * LinkedIn:

[QGIS-Developer] RES: QgsFeatureRequest SortByOrder

2018-06-04 Thread Jorge Almerio
Hi Matthias, Thank you very much! Regards, Jorge -Mensagem original- De: QGIS-Developer [mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Em nome de Matthias Kuhn Enviada em: segunda-feira, 4 de junho de 2018 04:14 Para: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org Assunto: Re: [QGIS-Developer]

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Github] Future of QGIS Oficial Repo

2018-06-04 Thread João Gaspar
Hi Nyall and Tim. Thanks for the feedback and opinion. Only see the news and share. I remember this in Madeira. Sorry how the way i exposed this topic. Best Regards, João 2018-06-04 12:13 GMT+01:00 Tim Sutton : > Hi Joāo > > Please see > >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Github] Future of QGIS Oficial Repo

2018-06-04 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi Joāo Please see https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/wiki/DeveloperMeetingMadeira2018#moving-the-qgis-bug-tracker-away-from-redmine There is a full video of the discussion there. Short version : it is planned. As an aside, I don’t think Microsoft acquiring GitHub is a good reason to move off it

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Github] Future of QGIS Oficial Repo

2018-06-04 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 4 June 2018 at 20:34, João Gaspar wrote: > Hi devs, > > the last news says that Microsoft will acquire the Github Platform. > > https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-03/microsoft-is-said-to-have-agreed-to-acquire-coding-site-github?utm_source=google_medium=bd=google > >

[QGIS-Developer] [Github] Future of QGIS Oficial Repo

2018-06-04 Thread João Gaspar
Hi devs, the last news says that Microsoft will acquire the Github Platform. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-03/microsoft-is-said-to-have-agreed-to-acquire-coding-site-github?utm_source=google_medium=bd=google https://itsfoss.com/microsoft-github/ Sorry i can't find the

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QgsFeatureRequest SortByOrder

2018-06-04 Thread Matthias Kuhn
Hi Jorge, There are two possibilities, one is to use the full-blown API with OrderBy class etc. And then there is a shorthand for this, called QgsFeatureRequest.addOrderBy which is enough in 90% of the cases. Short version: request = QgsFeatureRequest() request.addOrderBy('field_name')

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1335] Otoklim approval notification.

2018-06-04 Thread noreply
Plugin Otoklim approval by zimbogisgeek. The plugin version "[1335] Otoklim 0.1.4" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Otoklim/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1473] FastVersion approval notification.

2018-06-04 Thread noreply
Plugin FastVersion approval by zimbogisgeek. The plugin version "[1473] FastVersion 1.3.0" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/FastVersion/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: