Plugin qNote approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[122] qNote 2.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/qNote/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Plugin GeoHey Toolbox approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1349] GeoHey Toolbox 0.4" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/GeoHey-Toolbox/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Plugin DEMto3D approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[835] DEMto3D 3.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/DEMto3D/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 17:43, SIGéal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There is a bug in QGIS 3.4 which prevents from browsing virtual layers
> in DB Manager.
>
> Changing line 196 in \QGIS
> 3.4\apps\qgis\python\plugins\db_manager\db_plugins\vlayers\connectors.py
> from :
>
> for _, l in
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 01:44, C Hamilton wrote:
>
> I installed the stand alone QGIS 3.4.1 for Windows 64. If I go into the
> options and click on the OK button I get the following error:
>
> Wrong value for parameter "GRASS7 folder":
> Specified path does not exist:
>
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 02:10, David Adler wrote:
>
> Is there documentation on this or guidance on how to make it work?
>
> enable
> WITH_ASTYLE in cmake and build
Did you try this? If you enable this cmake option, an updated custom
astyle executable will be built alongside qgis.
Nyall
>
>
Plugin OSM place search approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[354] OSM place search 0.9.5 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/nominatim/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Plugin OSM place search approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[354] OSM place search 1.2.4 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/nominatim/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Is there documentation on this or guidance on how to make it work?
On mingw, cygwin and ubuntu this gives the message
qgisstyle / astyle not found - please install astyle >=3 or enable
WITH_ASTYLE in cmake and build
The latest version of astyle on cygwin and ubuntu is 2.05.
I modified
I installed the stand alone QGIS 3.4.1 for Windows 64. If I go into the
options and click on the OK button I get the following error:
Wrong value for parameter "GRASS7 folder":
Specified path does not exist:
C:\PROGRA~1\QGIS3~1.0\apps\grass\grass-7.4.0
The version of GRASS that is installed is
Plugin Clip Multiple Layers approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[761] Clip Multiple Layers 3.0.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/ClipMultipleLayers/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Plugin EO Time Series Viewer approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1456] EO Time Series Viewer 0.7.20181109T1533.develop" is
now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/timeseriesviewerplugin/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
Perhaps we could ask the OpenStreetMap mailing list for their advice on
licensing?
That was a joke. Let's not ask the OpenStreetMap mailing list for their
advice on licensing.
Tom
-
Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon
--
Sent from:
However, if we just talk about moving from GPL v2 to v3 - I think this
would definitely be possible.
A change to a more permissive license is a different thing. There you
need really, really good arguments to convince the majority of the
voting members, I think.
Please don't see this as a
Hi,
We talked about this very, very briefly on the PSC - and I can already
say that the topic is quite controversial within the PSC.
I really don't see consensus here at the moment. And even if the PSC
wants to move in this direction, it is the voting members who need to
agree to it - and I
>
>
> Your concerns are very valid, but could we defer this to a different
> discussion? I really want to avoid this becoming an us-vs-apple/debate
> about the merit of specific licenses, and instead allow it to focus
> solely on the question:
>
No worries to not talks about Apple stuff here.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 8:52 AM Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
>
> Your concerns are very valid, but could we defer this to a different
> discussion? I really want to avoid this becoming an us-vs-apple/debate
> about the merit of specific licenses, and instead allow it to focus
> solely on the question:
17 matches
Mail list logo