On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:29 AM wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Thank you for the lively debate.
>
>
>
> Just to answer the concerns regarding the VESPER exe.
>
>
>
> I am *not* distributing the VESPER exe with the plugin.
>
>
>
> There are instructions in the provided manual and on the github page on
>
Hi Christina
> On 07 Feb 2019, at 09:29,
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thank you for the lively debate.
>
> Just to answer the concerns regarding the VESPER exe.
>
> I am not distributing the VESPER exe with the plugin.
>
> There are instructions in the provided manual and on the github
Hi All,
Thank you for the lively debate.
Just to answer the concerns regarding the VESPER exe.
I am not distributing the VESPER exe with the plugin.
There are instructions in the provided manual and on the github page on where
to download VESPER and how to configure it for PAT on Windows. It
Hi devs,
sorry for cross-posting but I want to be be sure that all of you get
this email.
It seems that github-transifex have a direct integration.
Don't really know how/if we can dig into this topic, but it is worth to
mention ;)
Cheers
Matteo
Forwarded Message
Subject:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 00:56, C Hamilton wrote:
>
> I have a user that would like to have all the metadata from a NITF image
> available in QGIS. It appears that QGIS does not read it even though I can
> see it when I run gdalinfo in he OSGeo4W Shell. I haven't investigated this
> too much but
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 01:41, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> 2) For the Processing Toolbox, my understanding is that it requires
> significant effort to reflect the logic of a GRASS GIS module using
> QGIS' Processing interface to GRASS GIS. Am I wrong?
>
> If I go for the Processing option, however,
Plugin GeoDataFarm approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1412] GeoDataFarm 2.2.2" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/geodatafarm/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Hi,
I think 90% of the devs who stated their opinion in this thread are in
favour of allowing plugins that work only on one single OS. Not because
they like it particularly, but because they want to be pragmatic and
inclusive. I think this is already a clear statement.
We don't want to
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 16:21, Tim Sutton wrote:
> Even in core QGIS we have platform exclusion stuff - can anyone *actually*
> get grass algorithms to run on macOS?
Solid burn Tim. (But justified)
Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
Hi all
Frankly I am a little surprised at this thread. While I agree that we should
encourage the development of cross platform plugins, I don’t ever recall us
stating that it is a hard requirement, and it is not listed as such in the
plugin requirements page[1]. If it is going to be a
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 11:03, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 00:03, Alexandre Neto wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't think that the supported platforms of a plugin should be a
> > limitation for publishing it in the QGIS repository. If it's useful for a
> > high number of users,
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 00:03, Alexandre Neto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't think that the supported platforms of a plugin should be a limitation
> for publishing it in the QGIS repository. If it's useful for a high number of
> users, why not?
>
> To me the only important thing to do, is to inform
Here is the pull request kindly provided by Timothé
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/9107
Le mar. 5 févr. 2019 à 13:43, kimaidou a écrit :
> +1000 Thanks for your help regarding this nasty issue
>
> Le mar. 5 févr. 2019 à 08:00, Paolo Cavallini a
> écrit :
>
>> Agreed, a long standing
Hi Ale,
On Wed, 06. Feb 2019 at 14:09:56 +0100, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
> I'm not a lawyer but I believe that you are breaking the law if you do not
> run Apple software on Apple hardware.
Like QGIS? No, that's not illegal ;)
But running macOS on non-apple hardware is.
Jürgen
--
Jürgen
Hi Stefan
On 2/6/19 6:03 PM, Stefan Steiger wrote:
>
> Yea, but I preferably don’t want to have to lookup a website for every
> plugin if somebody gives me a list of plugins to install.
>
Luckily, the plugin manager can do that for us, just like pacman,
yaourt, aptitude et al.
Matthias
Yea, but I preferably don’t want to have to lookup a website for every plugin
if somebody gives me a list of plugins to install.
If you have plugins, there will generally be a few categories:
1) The ones that only use Python
2) The ones that use Python and custom python modules, or
Hi
On 2/6/19 5:28 PM, Stefan Steiger wrote:
>
>
>
> The problem with metadata is that if you use it, you have no way to
> easily know if something (a group of plugins) uses a
> platform-specific plugin.
>
>
>
> For example, in ubuntu, I can choose:
>
> - Official (secure)
>
> -
The problem with metadata is that if you use it, you have no way to easily know
if something (a group of plugins) uses a platform-specific plugin.
For example, in ubuntu, I can choose:
- Official (secure)
- Universe (insecure/half-legal)
- Partner
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 12:04 PM Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>
> On 06/02/19 09:42, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>
> > If you prefer to put it in QGIS repo: just add a big note in the
> > metadata.txt description that this plugin is only usable with vesper and
> > windows. And maybe do an OS check in
I have been following this interesting discussion and thought I would make
a couple of comments. I understand the different views people have. Ideally
it would be nice for all plugins to work on all platforms, but I can see
the benefit from certain plugins accessing external libraries that are not
Dear QGIS team,
Dear GRASS GIS team,
I kindly ask for some response on how to offer access to a GRASS GIS
add-on through QGIS.
I have asked again about this, months ago. Yet there are still
technicalities for which I need help to understand.
So, please bear with me and thank you in advance
Is it not possible to create two official repositories ?
One for "all-platforms", one for "dirty/fishy/phony/dubious/in-progress"
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: QGIS-Developer [mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Im Auftrag
von Martin Dobias
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Februar
Plugin GeoDyn Gemeente approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1444] GeoDyn Gemeente 0.17 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/GeodynGem/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
I have a user that would like to have all the metadata from a NITF image
available in QGIS. It appears that QGIS does not read it even though I can
see it when I run gdalinfo in he OSGeo4W Shell. I haven't investigated this
too much but is image metadata completely ignored in QGIS or is it ignored
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 12:04 PM Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>
> On 06/02/19 09:42, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>
> > If you prefer to put it in QGIS repo: just add a big note in the
> > metadata.txt description that this plugin is only usable with vesper and
> > windows. And maybe do an OS check in
On 2/6/19 12:04 PM, Paul Riedel wrote:
> Dear Devs.
>
> Kind of a help request here. Usually I would ask in a Discord or some
> other chat program but there doesn't seem to be one?
> I am trying to write a plugin to import Open Mining Format data into
> QGIS(and maybe export it??)
> Anyway, I
Hi Axel,
If you really want to test your plugin in macOS, you can sign up to one of
the cloud based services, which offers you remote access to a macOS
desktop. We use https://www.macincloud.com/ for QGIS macOS builds and their
customer service is very good.
Regards
Saber
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at
Hi,
I don't think that the supported platforms of a plugin should be a
limitation for publishing it in the QGIS repository. If it's useful for a
high number of users, why not?
To me the only important thing to do, is to inform the users of any OS
restriction, so that people don't waste time
Matthias Kuhn wrote
> If it's a single-purpose use-case specific plugin which is
> intended to be run inside a specific organization / scenario, then I
> don't see the benefit of investing a lot of effort into something that
> will never be used.
By "effort", do you mean the work to make it
Hi Axel,
There is the possibility to run continuous integration on various
platforms on travis-ci and there are other continuous integration
services as well. But I don't think you have the possibility to manually
click through the user interface there and really need to setup unit /
integration
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:59 PM Axel Andersson
wrote:
> On the subject, is there any possibility to test a plugin at another
> platform?
>
> I'm developing my plugin on Windows machine and I have a Linux server,
> which I can test the plugin on but when it comes to OSX I have no machine
> to test
On the subject, is there any possibility to test a plugin at another
platform?
I'm developing my plugin on Windows machine and I have a Linux server,
which I can test the plugin on but when it comes to OSX I have no machine
to test it on. Does anyone have experience/good cookbooks how to set up a
Hi
On 2/6/19 12:47 PM, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
> QGIS is for the users in the end, if this opens a new world of users,
> and note this is government funded, I don't think we should avoid
> allowing these kinds of things in. This isn't a core feature of QGIS
> and more of an exception than a rule.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 7:28 AM wrote:
> Hi QGIS dev list,
>
> I have just uploaded a new QGIS 2.18.x plugin called PAT - Precision
> Agriculture Tools. It relies on VESPER, a Windows only bit of software so
> therefore I went ahead writing a Windows only plugin using QGIS 2.18.x and
> the
QGIS is for the users in the end, if this opens a new world of users, and
note this is government funded, I don't think we should avoid allowing
these kinds of things in. This isn't a core feature of QGIS and more of an
exception than a rule. I don't see most plugins going this route but the
few
Sorry if I¡m too superficial without knowing deeply the plugin use cases,
this is my 2c:
if VESPER kiging is the reason limitate the plugin to only windows, is
something I do not understand. QGIS/processing with RSpatial, saga and
grass are full of kiging interpolation methods why not use the
Dear Devs.
Kind of a help request here. Usually I would ask in a Discord or some
other chat program but there doesn't seem to be one?
I am trying to write a plugin to import Open Mining Format data into
QGIS(and maybe export it??)
Anyway, I went through the process of setting up a new plugin
Hi all,
On 06/02/19 09:42, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
> If you prefer to put it in QGIS repo: just add a big note in the
> metadata.txt description that this plugin is only usable with vesper and
> windows. And maybe do an OS check in the __init__ for illiterate users ;-)
I respectfully
Plugin ClosestPoint approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1321] ClosestPoint 3.0.1 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/ClosestPoint/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Plugin PAT - Precision Agriculture Tools approval by NathanW.
The plugin version "[1631] PAT - Precision Agriculture Tools 0.1.0
Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/pat/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
Plugin Hqgis approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1616] Hqgis 0.3.6 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Hqgis/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Nyall Dawson wrote
>> Is anyone else seeing this?
Not on Github, no. Heh.
Tom
-
Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon
--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html
___
QGIS-Developer
On 2/6/19 7:28 AM, christina.ratcl...@csiro.au wrote:
> Hi QGIS dev list,
>
> I have just uploaded a new QGIS 2.18.x plugin called PAT - Precision
> Agriculture Tools. It relies on VESPER, a Windows only bit of software
> so therefore I went ahead writing a Windows only plugin using QGIS
>
Plugin Label2Attr approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1531] Label2Attr 1.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Label2Attr/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
44 matches
Mail list logo
