Hi Nyall
"Ok, we've hit a stalemate then. I was hoping to drop the additional
algorithms..." please remove. Try and error without a good statistic or
collection of maps where these options can do the difference IMHO is not
strong enough respect cleaning code and void bug fixing.
Luigi Pirelli
**
+1 for the removal too. Never could explain the difference. Playing with
number of candidates is a lot more useful than changing the algorithm.
Best regards
Régis
Le mar. 6 août 2019 à 08:14, Anita Graser a écrit :
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 4:40 AM Nyall Dawson
> wrote:
>
>> Does ANYONE underst
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 4:40 AM Nyall Dawson wrote:
> Does ANYONE understand or change this setting? Or would object to its
> complete removal?
>
I'd be +1 for removal. I know about the setting, don't understand the
algorithmic differences, have tried them in the past, didn't see meaningful
diff
Plugin Magic Wand approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1775] Magic Wand 1.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/MagicWand-master/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.o
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 at 17:33, Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.)
wrote:
>
> Yes, if you consider trial and error a mindful method, I "use" label
> placement algorithms when preparing a cartographic layout for printing.
> I mainly work on geographic data and web output, so it's not frequent and I
Hiii all,
On 05/08/19 11:10, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> On 8/5/19 1:00 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 18:13, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>>
>>> d) Stop shipping bugfixes (hint: joke, that makes the LTR concept
>>> pointless and anyone can do that today already by sticking to the .0
>>>
On 8/5/19 1:00 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 18:13, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
d) Stop shipping bugfixes (hint: joke, that makes the LTR concept
pointless and anyone can do that today already by sticking to the .0
patch release ;) )
Actually - jokes aside - this does raise a goo
