Yesterday at a dinner with many well known friendly faces, a discussion
started about the priorization of issues.
One of the main problems when deciding which issues to tackle is, that a
developer perspective often differs from the one from the average user
perspective.
So we thought it migh
Hi Matthias,
On 24/08/19 09:16, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> Yesterday at a dinner with many well known friendly faces, a discussion
> started about the priorization of issues.
>
> One of the main problems when deciding which issues to tackle is, that a
> developer perspective often differs from the on
Done, thanks for your patience.
Cheers.
On 21/08/19 06:14, Thắng Quách Đồng wrote:
> Dear Approval Team!
> I have been uploaded new version of HCMGIS Plugin for a while but
> received no approval
> So could u please to check and approve my new HCMGIS plugin
> https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/HCMGI
Plugin Midvatten approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[92] Midvatten 1.6.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/midvatten/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listin
Plugin Mascaret approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1350] Mascaret 1.0.3" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Mascaret/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinf
Plugin Mascaret approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1350] Mascaret 1.1.0 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Mascaret/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/ma
Plugin ORS Tools approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1659] ORS Tools 1.1.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/ORStools/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listi
Plugin ORS Tools approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1659] ORS Tools 1.1.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/ORStools/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listi
Plugin Kortforsyningen approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1037] Kortforsyningen 2.7" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Kortforsyningen/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.
Plugin MPA Post-Hoc Accounting approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1195] MPA Post-Hoc Accounting 0.22 Experimental" is now
approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/MPAPostHocAccounting/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo
Plugin Road Inspection Viewer approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1438] Road Inspection Viewer 1.2.2" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/road_inspection_viewer/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List inf
Plugin ArcGIS ImageServer Connector approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1633] ArcGIS ImageServer Connector 2.1.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/ImageServerConnector/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.or
Hi Paolo
On 8/24/19 9:21 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Hi Matthias,
On 24/08/19 09:16, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
Yesterday at a dinner with many well known friendly faces, a discussion
started about the priorization of issues.
One of the main problems when deciding which issues to tackle is, that a
d
Thanks Matthias, thanks for this, as of course it *is* the eright thing to
do,
I only hope that next time this will be at least announced a little bit
more in advance other than a Saturday morning, during August, at the start
of the dev meeting.
I did in the past several "priority lists" and it t
> I would say we better leave this role to the developers
>
what role, to choose what to fix? if yes then... no, not completely at
least.
-- G --
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/l
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 08:48:01AM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Hi all,
> any news about this? I believe it's a bad regression.
> Sandro, did you open a ticket? Any idea about when this popped up?
I actually fixed it in master branch
(ae0721891b6b521ee0d0a3dd8b8a8b092b017554)
and backported it
Plugin CKAN-Browser approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[922] CKAN-Browser 0.4.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/CKANBrowser/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailm
Plugin Group Transparency approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1682] Group Transparency 0.2" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/group_transparency/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lis
On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 at 18:40, Giovanni Manghi wrote:
> As someone else said is not true that a "bug is a bug": while certainly there
> are issues that is not easy to classify if they impact a lot or not, the vast
> majoity is easy to to say if they are important or not. Do not confound the
> f
Plugin EO Time Series Viewer approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1456] EO Time Series Viewer 1.7.20190821T1246.master" is
now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/timeseriesviewerplugin/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.
Plugin GPX Segment Importer approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1376] GPX Segment Importer 2.4" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/GpxSegmentImporter/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https:/
Hi all
Last night we were discussing a bit the GitHub tracker. One thing we don’t have
is a way for non-core developers to self assign issues. Or for example for me
to assign a ticket to someone from my company to work on. I understand that
developers do not want random people to assign tickets
good idea, +1
thanks
On 24/08/19 11:19, Tim Sutton wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Last night we were discussing a bit the GitHub tracker. One thing we
> don’t have is a way for non-core developers to self assign issues. Or
> for example for me to assign a ticket to someone from my company to work
> on. I un
Hi Nyall,
Putting aside the rest of the conversation regarding regressions for
> now, something I'd like to see clarified is what exactly classifies as
> a regression?
>
in my mind, a regression is some functionality that worked and does not
work anymore. It also does not have an acceptable wor
Hi Matthias,
On 24/08/19 10:06, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> I think this is mainly a point of communication.
>
> If explained well as an "indication" and not as a "guarantee" - online
> and live while teaching - I think we'll get the message out.
agreed, but I'm still unsure we'll be able to convey
Plugin Easy Processing Tool approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1790] Easy Processing Tool 0.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/easy_processing_tool/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https
Plugin LandXML2QGIS approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1794] LandXML2QGIS 0.1 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/landxml2qgis/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.os
Hi
On 8/24/19 10:39 AM, Giovanni Manghi wrote:
Thanks Matthias, thanks for this, as of course it *is* the eright
thing to do,
I only hope that next time this will be at least announced a little
bit more in advance other than a Saturday morning, during August, at
the start of the dev meeting.
Hello Nyall and all contributors,
I while ago I made a PR to improve on the 'world' easter egg (have
better data under it),
as well as adding two more layers:
- province/state boundaries
- disputed borders
Those would not be added to the canvas when invoking the 'world' easter
egg but coul
Plugin Three-D Change Detection approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1786] Three-D Change Detection 0.1 Experimental" is now
approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Three_D_Change_Detection-master/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer
Dear QGIS Devs,
Recently, I received two messages from users concerning the speed of
processing algorithms which are implemented in the QNEAT3 plugin. More
specifically, they report that the execution time of algorithms slow
down up to 10 times when the algorithm is used in the graphical model
31 matches
Mail list logo
