Hi
> On 22 Jul 2020, at 08:48, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 at 17:39, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nyall,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> Thanks for explaining the issue about the enforced rasterization of the line
>> pattern fills. Any rough estimate how much the
I'm also very interested in any information regarding getting GDAL 3.1 into
stable builds and/or what is possibly blocking it.
Made https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/37384 some time ago which is
perhaps not the place to ask/track it.
Den mån 22 juni 2020 kl 21:21 skrev Peet Whittaker :
> Is
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 at 17:39, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> Hi Nyall,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Thanks for explaining the issue about the enforced rasterization of the line
> pattern fills. Any rough estimate how much the speed penalty would be when
> one would implement the line pattern fill
Hi Nyall,
Thanks for your reply.
Thanks for explaining the issue about the enforced rasterization of the
line pattern fills. Any rough estimate how much the speed penalty would
be when one would implement the line pattern fill purely as vector?
Also - would it be possible to "enforce"
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 19:34, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In our efforts to improve cartographic quality, I'd also like to discuss, if
> we could somehow improve the quality of the line-pattern fills, and/or the
> antialiasing quality of the qt renderer. A very small change in angle can
