On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 at 06:13, Sandro Santilli via QGIS-PSC
wrote:
>
>
>
> On June 21, 2024 11:14:59 AM GMT+02:00, "Jürgen E. Fischer via QGIS-PSC"
> wrote:
> >On Fri, 21. Jun 2024 at 10:22:14 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> >> It's packaging time today but I still have 5 pull requests pending
On June 21, 2024 11:14:59 AM GMT+02:00, "Jürgen E. Fischer via QGIS-PSC"
wrote:
>On Fri, 21. Jun 2024 at 10:22:14 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>> It's packaging time today but I still have 5 pull requests pending approval
>> reviews:
>>
>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pulls/strk
>
>As
Hi everyone,
Here's the report regarding the development and maintenance of the QGIS-related
websites for this week:
Overview:
This week, I focused on testing and deploying the latest changes on the QGIS
plugins website. I’ve also worked on some of the open issues in QGIS Django,
QGIS Feed,
Hi
I do think 1 of them is a user facing issue. It had a test added a couple
of minutes ago, so it's coming in hot. It's approved now.
2 of the pull requests are in draft, so not ready for review.
The other 2 are not user facing bugs but improving handling of local test
execution, which I don't
Hi Sandro,
On Fri, 21. Jun 2024 at 10:22:14 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> It's packaging time today but I still have 5 pull requests
> pending approval reviews:
>
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pulls/strk
As far as I can tell none of those are fixes for user facing bugs.
> This mail is
It's packaging time today but I still have 5 pull requests
pending approval reviews:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pulls/strk
It is the well-known problem of the current review policy
blocking changeflow.
One of them was reviewed and approved by Benoit who was
the last one touching the file
