then we get an exit code 139. Doing
the same while executing the docker in interactive mode, we see that it has
a segmentation fault after finishing running the tests:
== 80 passed, 1 warning in 1.38s ==
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Has anyone else experienced the same issues? Do you have
Dear QGIS developers,
I published https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/svir/version/3.17.4/ on
November 6, but I see it is still not approved. Probably it was
accidentally missed.
Please, may you check it?
Thanks very much,
Paolo
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 2:21 PM Paolo Tormene <
paolo.t
Hello. Please, may someone approve this?
https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/svir/version/3.16.4/
Thank you very much,
Paolo
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:31 AM Paolo Tormene <
paolo.torm...@globalquakemodel.org> wrote:
> Hello. I'm writing to notify you that on October 11 I uploaded t
ersion was
neglected by accident. May you check, please?
Thank you in advance,
Paolo
--
*PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882
*GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL * working together to assess risk
*GEM -* globalquakemodel.org <http://www.globalquakemodel.org> *T -*
@GEMwrld <h
).
Was it intentionally removed? If so, was it replaced by anything similar?
Thank you in advance,
Paolo
--
*PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882
*GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL * working together to assess risk
*GEM -* globalquakemodel.org <http://www.globalquakemodel.org> *T -*
@GEMwrld
: No module named 'qgslayoutchecker'
Please note that the same tests run without issues using the
'qgis/qgis:release-3_22' docker instead.
Has anyone experienced the same problem?
Thank you and best regards,
Paolo
--
*PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882
*GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL
macosx-10.13.0-x86_64.egg/PIL/_
imaging.cpython-38-darwin.so'
Reason: tried: '/opt/X11/lib/libxcb.1.dylib' (no such file),
'/usr/local/lib/libxcb.1.dylib' (no such file), '/usr/lib/libxcb.1.dylib'
(no such file)
Cheers,
Paolo
--
*PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882
al-3_22_10 -> KO
qgis:final-3_22_9 -> OK (it seems to work as expected until this version)
Were there any significant changes between 3_22_9 and 3_22_10 that might
have caused this? Do you have any suggestions?
Thank you,
Paolo
--
*PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882
*G
Changed and uses
QgsVectorLayer.selectByExpression to modify the selection on-the-fly if
needed).
I am curious, anyway, if this behavior of the feature selector is expected
and if it was made on purpose.
Thank you in advance,
Paolo
--
*PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882
*GLOBAL
OpenQuake
Integrated Risk Modelling Toolkit.
For the above reasons, our answer to your question is yes, we do really need
this feature. And if you decide to drop it, we will have to significantly
redesign our release workflow.
Paolo Tormene, on behalf of the OpenQuake Team
[1] https://plugins.qgis.org/
10 matches
Mail list logo