Interesting thought. But then, what scenario are you imagining? "Mozilla
5.0" is typically for web-browsers (Richards original point), it doesn't
seem to be used for most other GIS and tooling (at least when making OGC
requests).
Examples of other user-agents that I have to hand (somewhat date
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 09:05, Jonathan Moules
wrote:
>
> This makes sense, but thinking about it, it doesn't seem plausible.
>
> If I were whitelisting user agents, there are three ways I'd consider
> doing it.
>
> Explicit full string:
> * "Mozilla/5.0 QGIS/3.4.3-Madeira" - except of course that'
This makes sense, but thinking about it, it doesn't seem plausible.
If I were whitelisting user agents, there are three ways I'd consider
doing it.
Explicit full string:
* "Mozilla/5.0 QGIS/3.4.3-Madeira" - except of course that'd break next
time someone updates QGIS by even a point version.
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 at 04:38, Jonathan Moules
wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> I don't think without more information it's clear precisely what QGIS
> should change to help them?
>
> Indeed, personally I'm still not sure what the current problem is for
> them. I get that they have some over-users of the
Hi Richard,
I don't think without more information it's clear precisely what QGIS
should change to help them?
Indeed, personally I'm still not sure what the current problem is for
them. I get that they have some over-users of their service and need to
curtail this (a very tricky problem), bu
On 23/02/2019 12.04, Jonathan Moules wrote:
> It seems to me there are a few different aspects to this.
>
> - The convention is to stick "Mozilla 5" into user-agents for browsers
> because every other browser uses it. At this point they all pretend to
> be each other -
> https://stackoverflow.com/
It seems to me there are a few different aspects to this.
- The convention is to stick "Mozilla 5" into user-agents for browsers
because every other browser uses it. At this point they all pretend to
be each other -
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1114254/why-do-all-browsers-user-agents-st
On 21/02/2019 08.56, Mathieu Pellerin wrote:
> I would really like to understand (i.e. get an explanation) from the OSM
> admins as to why a user agent that explicitly identifies itself as QGIS
> like we have now is not enough for them before moving forward.
>
> Being a web admin/developer myself,
I would really like to understand (i.e. get an explanation) from the OSM
admins as to why a user agent that explicitly identifies itself as QGIS
like we have now is not enough for them before moving forward.
Being a web admin/developer myself, I can hardly find a reason why that's
not enough.
I'm
On 21/02/2019 00.20, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 02:30, Richard Duivenvoorde
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Devs, PSC,
>>
>> I had a short talk on IRC to 'Firefishy' the person who runs
>> tile.openstreetmap.org CDN
>> (in bcc, and see: http://irclogs.geoapt.com/qgis/%23qgis.2019-02-20.log)
>
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 02:30, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>
> Hi Devs, PSC,
>
> I had a short talk on IRC to 'Firefishy' the person who runs
> tile.openstreetmap.org CDN
> (in bcc, and see: http://irclogs.geoapt.com/qgis/%23qgis.2019-02-20.log)
>
> In short: he/osm has an issue with QGIS using 'Mo
11 matches
Mail list logo
