Hi Eugenio,
I've opened a ticket in QGIS bug tracker, to try to identify the source of
the problem:
https://issues.qgis.org/issues/16646
Please see the recent findings and give your feedback there.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Pedro Venâncio
2017-06-01 8:43 GMT+01:00 Eugenio Trumpy :
> Hi Pedr
Hi Pedro,
I did the same for 5 pixels in the test raster I shared with you yesterday.
The different seems to be a little bit greater.
See the attached sheet.
I don't know if the version of saga, 2.3.1 the mine vs 2.3.2 the yours could
generate this error,
or if the problem is in qgis proces
Hi Pedro,
thank you again.
If it helps, yesterday I tested the two operation in separate process,
I mean I performed Formula 1 and I saved the result as tif, the I run
the formula 2. I saw that there wasn't errors.
So I guess the problem is when I concatenate the computations in a single
pro
Hi Eugenio,
I've created a sample processing model (attached), that works ok, except a
small error in the result (decimals).
For instance:
*Raster* *ID* *Pixel value*
Z_top_res a 1202,03510276
t_top_res b 53,6123428345
topo c1 -182,584899902
SAGA Result 1 c 15,1783676147
SAGA Result 2 d 31,94373
