Hi Alex,
thanks for reworking bigger parts of the processing SAGA provider!
Really appreciated.
I am writing you as the maintainer of the ports of SAGA GIS and QGIS for
the FreeBSD OS[1][2].
For some reasons, we don't package our system with different versions of
SAGA GIS. Recent FreeBSD c
Hi Rainer,
2017-06-08 10:24 GMT+03:00 Rainer Hurling :
> For some reasons, we don't package our system with different versions of
> SAGA GIS. Recent FreeBSD comes with SAGA GIS version 3.0.0, I am working on
> an update to version 4.1.0.
>
> With your latest updates to QGIS (r413c6e5), newer versi
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the quick and detailed answer.
Am 08.06.2017 um 11:29 schrieb Alexander Bruy:
Hi Rainer,
2017-06-08 10:24 GMT+03:00 Rainer Hurling :
For some reasons, we don't package our system with different versions of
SAGA GIS. Recent FreeBSD comes with SAGA GIS version 3.0.0, I am wo
I forgot to mention, that if only FreeBSD users should have the problem
with newer SAGA GIS versions and not having an LTR version, a local
patch in the FreeBSD port is also conceivable.
Something like the following patches makes the processing tools for SAGA
GIS, newer than version 2.3.x, 'fu
Hi Rainer,
That is not the case. The problem is that SAGA team changes very often the
sintax of the SAGA modules, even between minor updates, wich causes
problems with SAGA Processing implementation.
A big issue is the creation of models and scripts in Processing, using SAGA
algorithms. With that
Hi Pedro,
Thanks also for your explanations.
Am 08.06.2017 um 15:14 schrieb Pedro VenĂ¢ncio:
Hi Rainer,
That is not the case. The problem is that SAGA team changes very often
the sintax of the SAGA modules, even between minor updates, wich causes
problems with SAGA Processing implementation.