Hi Richard,
Yes, I saw Andreas request just after I sent the mail yesterday.
Sorry for the noise... or let's says that it was a reminder/call for
changelog contributors. :)
Regards,
H.
2018-04-23 20:12 GMT+02:00 Richard Duivenvoorde :
> On 23-04-18 11:40, DelazJ wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I can
On 23-04-18 11:40, DelazJ wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can see that there still are some undocumented features ;( but would
> like to know if there are news/plan on the changelog release?
> I find it less user friendly to show (untranslated) github links to
> people (that's what comes in mind to me firs
Hi all,
I can see that there still are some undocumented features ;( but would like
to know if there are news/plan on the changelog release?
I find it less user friendly to show (untranslated) github links to people
(that's what comes in mind to me first!) when they ask about new features
(not yet
Hi
And just to add to Andrea’s reply, for each changelog entry there is an option
to add who sponsored the entry and a link to their site. Vincent if you would
like to supply me some text and a screenshot, I will be happy to add an entry
to the changelog for this feature.
Thanks for supportin
Dear Vincent,
Thank you for letting us know about this.
There is a clear distinction between sponsors and donors on one hand
(listed both at https://www.qgis.org/en/site/about/sponsorship.html) who
contribute their funds to the discretion of the QGIS.ORG project and
other financial contributo
Hi,
don't know if this is the right place to ask, but:
Last year we (satelligence.com) sponsored the 'discrete raster styling'
work by Nyall (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/4308) with €1500. I
don't see a direct mention of that PR in the visual changelog, however,
I do see a lot of company
Hi
> On 16 Mar 2018, at 14:39, Régis Haubourg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with what Andreas proposes, ie announce clearly a date to the end of
> April, then make a copy to the website.
>
> I still try to polish the changelog currently, some entries are hard to
> understand or deserve animated
2018-03-16 13:39 GMT+01:00 Régis Haubourg :
> I would suggest that the validation workflow submits the new version to
> moderators, and that a copy of the old version stays published. A message
> to inform the author he needs some validation would be necessary too.
>
Régis, there is a ticket to r
Hi,
I agree with what Andreas proposes, ie announce clearly a date to the end
of April, then make a copy to the website.
I still try to polish the changelog currently, some entries are hard to
understand or deserve animated gif's and some entries can be factorized in
one only for a shorter change
Hi,
Personally, I don't think that the visual changelog will be translated
(I might be wrong though). Given that we struggle to get enough
contributors for even the english master version chances are low, that
they will be translates. I kind of promised to continue to work on it,
but was too busy
See subject :-)
Should we 'freeze' current status of the visual changelog?
Or are there any items which should be a added/polished.
For earlier releases we always 'ported' the changelog to the website:
https://qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog218/index.html
This made the changelog trans
11 matches
Mail list logo