GDAL 3.0.3 has just been released.
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 00:47, Even Rouault wrote:
>
> On jeudi 19 décembre 2019 13:09:38 CET Even Rouault wrote:
> > > Any news from GDAL team?
> >
> > I was floating the idea of having a GDAL 3.0.3 release somewhere in January,
> > but that's dependent on a volunteer taking on that. Someone was
On jeudi 19 décembre 2019 13:09:38 CET Even Rouault wrote:
> > Any news from GDAL team?
>
> I was floating the idea of having a GDAL 3.0.3 release somewhere in January,
> but that's dependent on a volunteer taking on that. Someone was willing to
> give his first try at releasing GDAL, but I'm not
+1 with postponing the minor version AND advertise largely why we do this.
Regards
Régis
Le jeu. 19 déc. 2019 à 08:00, Paolo Cavallini a
écrit :
> Hi again,
>
> Il 19/12/19 07:57, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
> > On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 16:51, Paolo Cavallini
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Nyall,
> >>
Merci Even for your response
Il 19/12/19 13:09, Even Rouault ha scritto:
>> Any news from GDAL team?
>
> I was floating the idea of having a GDAL 3.0.3 release somewhere in January,
> but that's dependent on a volunteer taking on that. Someone was willing to
> give his first try at releasing
> Any news from GDAL team?
I was floating the idea of having a GDAL 3.0.3 release somewhere in January,
but that's dependent on a volunteer taking on that. Someone was willing to
give his first try at releasing GDAL, but I'm not sure if he's still
available, and if that can be done before Jan
Fine, happy it's going so smoothly.
Any news from GDAL team?
Cheers.
Il 19/12/19 09:07, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On Thu, 19. Dec 2019 at 08:00:21 +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> In this case I don't see a major problem in postponing a point release,
>> or even skipping it
Hi Paolo,
On Thu, 19. Dec 2019 at 08:00:21 +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> In this case I don't see a major problem in postponing a point release,
> or even skipping it until the next one - am I wrong?
We have practice with that. And the last point release was just was
two weeks ago - so this
Hi,
I also think we should postpone or skip the release in the current
situation.
But it would be good, if we would communicate it to our users with the
various channels we have (release road map, blog post, news feed).
Greetings,
Andreas
On 2019-12-19 08:00, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Great news, best way to open 2020 :)
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019, 14:14 Kristian Evers wrote:
>
>
> On 19 Dec 2019, at 03:37, Mathieu Pellerin wrote:
>
> Having helped out chasing down some of these CRS and transformation issues
> under GDAL3/PROJ6, I too feel *very* uncomfortable shipping the next
On 19 Dec 2019, at 03:37, Mathieu Pellerin
mailto:nirvn.a...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Having helped out chasing down some of these CRS and transformation issues
under GDAL3/PROJ6, I too feel *very* uncomfortable shipping the next QGIS point
release with anything lesser than GDAL3 and PROJ6 master
Hi again,
Il 19/12/19 07:57, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 16:51, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nyall,
>> thanks for clarifying this. Wouldn't it be reasonable to ask gdal+proj
>> teams to release a new fixed version ASAP? Even if we fix this in the
>> Windows installer,
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 16:51, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>
> Hi Nyall,
> thanks for clarifying this. Wouldn't it be reasonable to ask gdal+proj
> teams to release a new fixed version ASAP? Even if we fix this in the
> Windows installer, where we (Juergen) have full control, we'll still
> have issues
Hi Nyall,
thanks for clarifying this. Wouldn't it be reasonable to ask gdal+proj
teams to release a new fixed version ASAP? Even if we fix this in the
Windows installer, where we (Juergen) have full control, we'll still
have issues on other OSs where we cannot control dependencies.
Cheers.
Il
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 12:37, Mathieu Pellerin wrote:
> To be clear, QGIS had plenty to fix itself, and that’s been taken care of
> (thanks to QGIS’s PSC for financing Nyall here).
s/been/being/
;)
Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
Having helped out chasing down some of these CRS and transformation issues
under GDAL3/PROJ6, I too feel *very* uncomfortable shipping the next QGIS
point release with anything lesser than GDAL3 and PROJ6 master as of
yesterday.
To be clear, QGIS had plenty to fix itself, and that’s been taken
Hi list,
Just want to raise this discussion prior to the 3.10.2 patch release.
The situation as I see it is that there is absolutely critical fixes
in GDAL and PROJ master branches which are not available in any of the
GDAL/PROJ stable releases, all relating to CRS and transformation
handling.
17 matches
Mail list logo
