Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-04 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 04/12/2012 22:56, Victor Olaya ha scritto: > However, I guess most people are talking about user documentation. Do > you mean algorithm documentation? Documentation about the SEXTANTE > framework itself? IMHO algorithm documentation. > GRASS algorithms are all fully documented, since we use t

Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-04 Thread Victor Olaya
Many people mention documentation. As I said, we are interested in documenting how to develop with SEXTANTE, which is a great priority in order to keep the project alive. However, I guess most people are talking about user documentation. Do you mean algorithm documentation? Documentation about the

Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-03 Thread Pirmin Kalberer
Hi Victor Am Freitag, 30. November 2012, 23.52:20 schrieb Victor Olaya: [.] > > Let's start with the second point How do you think we should spend > this money on SEXTANTE? > My personal priority list: 1. Reanimate Python code export 2. Support for database tables as input and output ty

Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-01 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 01/12/2012 08:53, Alexander Bruy ha scritto: > I think first we should fix as much bugs as possible (now there are > 76 tickets in bugtracker). Also important topics are: > - i18n support (most strings are not translatable, some algorithms >can't handle non-ASCII filenames etc) > - moving

Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-01 Thread Alexander Bruy
Hi Victor, On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 23:52:20 +0100 Victor Olaya wrote: > Let's start with the second point How do you think we should spend > this money on SEXTANTE? I think first we should fix as much bugs as possible (now there are 76 tickets in bugtracker). Also important topics are: - i18n s