Hi,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:10 AM, kimaidou wrote:
> +1 with Paolo
> I prefer the new default qgis icon set, but I do not understand why we
> need to remove the other icon sets, as long as the "qgis" theme is the new
> default one.
>
A big -1 for the project maintaining 2 themes. If the old
+1 with Paolo
I prefer the new default qgis icon set, but I do not understand why we need
to remove the other icon sets, as long as the "qgis" theme is the new
default one.
2013/5/24 Paolo Cavallini
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Il 24/05/2013 17:42, Matthias Kuhn ha scri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 24/05/2013 17:42, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
> I'm along the lines of Werner, Anita, Marco... The new "gis" icon set
> looks much more professional than the old icon set and the look of the
> icon set actually gives the software a whole different
Hi,
I'm along the lines of Werner, Anita, Marco... The new "gis" icon set
looks much more professional than the old icon set and the look of the
icon set actually gives the software a whole different look.
From what I've read here, the main concern lies on the add layer icons
which look too s
Hi Marco,
I'm afraid I respectfully disagree. A "short adaptation period" won't make
the icons more obvious.
I'm not a big QGIS user. If I want to use /any/ function in QGIS, I have to
stare at the icons and use the tooltips to figure out what button does
what, so I'm not "adapted" to the 1.8 set,
Agree as well with Werner and Anita.
It is just matter of a short adaptation period.
Ciao
On 05/24/2013 01:34 PM, Anita Graser wrote:
Hi,
-1. I agree with Werner. Having used the "gis" icon set for many months,
I have problems using the old ones. That's just how the human mind works.
Let's imp
Hi Jonathan,
You are right. Problem with new icons is that we have started with some
idea (add raster, vector, PostgreSQL layer) and end up with several
icons of the same type. First three icons are different, however have
too many elements. Next are worse, and Oracle and others wait for more
Hi,
I fully agree with Werner and Anita. "gis" theme is consistent, clear
and looks much better
then old icons. Maybe all we need is only some small improvements in
color scheme as
suggested by Robert.
So, -1 for keeping old icons.
2013/5/24, Anita Graser :
> Hi,
>
> -1. I agree with Werner. Hav
Hi,
-1. I agree with Werner. Having used the "gis" icon set for many months, I
have problems using the old ones. That's just how the human mind works.
Let's improve the "gis" icons where it makes sense but let us focus or work
on one set.
Best wishes,
Anita
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Wer
Hi!
-1 for keeping the old Icons..
I'd rather vote to probably leave them for 2.0 but get rid of them
afterwards.. It does not make any sense to have different sets of icons ..
And as GRASS is using the same icon set in their GUI it does indeed make
sense to use it probably in every open source G
I would like to ask the "powers that be" to keep the old and trusted icons.
They never failed me and the gui is quite uplifting. The new set may be
technically better but is not as friendly to users.
Please keep both.
Duarte
De: Jonathan Moules [mailto:jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk]
Envia
+1
i.e. The difference between the "Add PostGIS layers" and "Add SpatiaLite
layers" is that one has a regular cylinder and the other has a fat-waisted
hour-glass cylinder - about 20-30 pixels are different in an icon that's
got 1024 pixels! I have to look at them in detail to see the differences.
that could be a useful option.
sincerely, from my point of view, many icons are
unreadable/undistinguishable so i click them correctly only because now i
remberer relative position
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Re-Qgis-user-New-Icons-difficult-to-read-tp5
On 24/05/2013 09:28, Paolo Cavallini
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 24/05/2013 07:36, Ziegler Stefan ha scritto:
Hi
I do have exactly the same problem. E.g. I almost cannot see any difference between the WMS/WCS/WFS icons e
Hi,
It's good time now to add colours to similar sets (like open * layer).
Waiting for proposals... with short description of your associations.
Robert
On 24.05.2013 08:28, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 24/05/2013 07:36, Ziegler Stefan ha scritto:
Hi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 24/05/2013 07:36, Ziegler Stefan ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> I do have exactly the same problem. E.g. I almost cannot see any difference
> between the WMS/WCS/WFS icons except on a very tiny part of the icons whereas
> the old icons were easy to disting
16 matches
Mail list logo
