hi all,
starting qgis, the scale indicator in the status bar works for few
seconds and then it blocks to a minimum value of 1:13 or maximum to 1:849.
At the same time, if I choose the fixed-values it doesn't work as well.
am i the only one? I didn't find any ticket. This happens for 2.8.2
hi devs,
here two strange situations:
- modifying the parameters included in a tool file, opening QGIS it
still show the original version of the file;
- adding a tool in the LidarToolsAlgorithmProvider, QGIS still show the
initial 13 ones (and not 14).
Any clue?
I'm working on some tools of
Hello,
Le mercredi 29 avril 2015, 08:11:57 Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
Il 29/04/2015 08:07, kimaidou ha scritto:
auto-update feature
a la Firefox, but a simple warning could be a great addition IMHO.
+1
Having a RSS feed on the website, with all released versions
Il 29/04/2015 08:07, kimaidou ha scritto:
auto-update feature
a la Firefox, but a simple warning could be a great addition IMHO.
+1
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
___
Qgis-developer
Hi all
+ 1 for Tim's proposal, as it is more readable and predictable. Another
thing concerns me : I think many users are not in Twitter, or following the
user or dev mailing list, and can easily miss the point release
announcements. I think we could add in core a small tool which will behaves
as
On 28 Apr 2015, at 19:23, Jürgen E. Fischer j...@norbit.de wrote:
Hi Sandro,
On Tue, 28. Apr 2015 at 11:44:15 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Let's try hard to avoid backports unless very very important ?
PS: I'd be in favor of reducing the silence requirement to 1 week,
especially
Hi Sandro,
On Tue, 28. Apr 2015 at 11:44:15 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Let's try hard to avoid backports unless very very important ?
PS: I'd be in favor of reducing the silence requirement to 1 week,
especially for the first few bugfix releases...
If only our largest gap was large
Il 28/04/2015 11:44, Sandro Santilli ha scritto:
Let's try hard to avoid backports unless very very important ?
-1
backports are useful, otherwise thaty would not have been done.
perhaps a moving window as suggested by Juergen could be a solution.
thanks.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Hi
Personally I think we should have a system that is simple to track (for users,
developers and our beleaguered release manager) so that would rule out anything
that requires individual assessment of patches. I very much like the idea of
having a month end bugfix release even if there has
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:52:18PM +, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
Sorry to be a pain in the butt but do we have a update on when we could
expect a 2.8.2 release?
It's up to us all. If we handle to stop pushing changes to the 2.8
branch for two weeks, we get the 2.8.2 release cut.
I see a lot of
Sorry to be a pain in the butt but do we have a update on when we could
expect a 2.8.2 release?
I see a lot of emails of late all hitting the bugs that have been fixed for
this release.
- Nathan
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
On 23 March 2015 at 19:14, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:49:24PM +0100, Anita Graser wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it
wrote:
Il 11/03/2015 15:15, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
There already is a
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 07:30:26PM +1100, Nyall Dawson wrote:
On 23 March 2015 at 19:14, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:49:24PM +0100, Anita Graser wrote:
I know that fixes/backports haven't really slowed down yet (
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:49:24PM +0100, Anita Graser wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it
wrote:
Il 11/03/2015 15:15, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
There already is a nightly build of the release branch in OSGeo4W now
(package
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:28:55PM +0100, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
It may just be me, but I don't think any of this brings a huge benefit.
The rule also brings some overhead. When I find a bug that's not in the
tracker I prefer to just fix it and describe what has been done in the
commit message.
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it
wrote:
Il 11/03/2015 15:15, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
There already is a nightly build of the release branch in OSGeo4W now
(package
qgis-rel-dev since march 5th).
Thanks Juergen. I think a standalone
Hi Paolo,
On Tue, 10. Mar 2015 at 11:31:06 +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
We have 20 fixes backported, some of them rather important: would it be
time to release a 2.8.2?
There already is a nightly build of the release branch in OSGeo4W now (package
qgis-rel-dev since march 5th).
Jürgen
--
Hi all.
We have 20 fixes backported, some of them rather important: would it be
time to release a 2.8.2?
Sorry Juergen I'm asking for more work on your side ;)
All the best, and thanks.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:53:28AM +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Hi all.
Il 10/03/2015 11:46, Sandro Santilli ha scritto:
Communicated policy was that any new patch-level release is cut
(automatically, I've understood) after 2 weeks of silence in the
stable branch:
REF:
19 matches
Mail list logo
