Re: [Qgis-developer] Auto documentation commit hook

2015-12-01 Thread DelazJ
Hi, Given that there is already a long queue to deal with in Doc repo (with two releases without documentation), it would be nice if the next QGIS release number is automatically tagged on the issue. It'll prevent writers to add documentation about 2.14 features while writing 2.12. 2015-11-27 9:57

Re: [Qgis-developer] Auto documentation commit hook

2015-11-27 Thread Yves Jacolin
Hello, Some request, question: 1) A new request (or not): what if the code is reverted? Is it possible to add a comment in the document ticket? 2) About the new tag "Need docs": do we really want a new tag instead of just changing the tag to [Documentation] which could just mean "We need to do

Re: [Qgis-developer] Auto documentation commit hook

2015-11-27 Thread Richard Duivenvoorde
Currently the hook seems broken, I'll try to fix it this afternoon/evening. Happy to do add the 'needs docs' tag too. Is this already a tag? Just sent me the exact tag text, and the type of issue that you want me to make for it in Documentation issue-list. Matthias had also a feature request: ht

Re: [Qgis-developer] Auto documentation commit hook

2015-11-26 Thread Alexandre Neto
Nyall, that would be useful. And GUI changes as well. In Docs we have tags for identify the need to create new screenshots for users manual. DelazJ escreveu no dia qui, 26/11/2015 às 23:06: > Hi, > BTW, it's not against Documentation repo but could this also be used to > fetch bug fixes so that

Re: [Qgis-developer] Auto documentation commit hook

2015-11-26 Thread DelazJ
Hi, BTW, it's not against Documentation repo but could this also be used to fetch bug fixes so that a list of bug fixes can be generated to accompany qgis releases? 2015-11-26 22:40 GMT+01:00 Nyall Dawson : > Hi all, > > Just a thought I had - could the new hook which creates a documentation > is

[Qgis-developer] Auto documentation commit hook

2015-11-26 Thread Nyall Dawson
Hi all, Just a thought I had - could the new hook which creates a documentation issue when the message contains "feature" be amended so that it detects an additional "needs docs" tag too? My thoughts are that sometimes a change should be accompanied by documentation updates but isn't a new featur