I agree that moving plugins (well not plugins, but their functions)
into core libraries will be good. This allows to access some
functions via API (Python/C++) and don't reimplement already
available algorithms.
This also allow us remove some icons from toolbars, because some
algorithms can be cal
>
> I would like to propose that we move, over time of course, most of the
> core plugins into the core feature set itself and discourage core
> plugin building.
>
Hey!
Many good points.
And fully agree .. "core plugins" sounds like a testbed for functions
that have to be tested before integratin
Il 27/12/2012 12:07, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
> * Python API can be used with Sextante
to me this would be a major advantage, as pointed out earlier.
all the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.
Hey all,
What are peoples thoughts about making some of the core plugins into core
features of QGIS. To me I think that most of the core plugins would be
great additions into the core feature set of QGIS. Some of the advantages
for me would be:
- Allow us to give some of the excellent featu