On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Alex Mandel wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 07:40 AM, Ivan Mincik wrote:
>
>> On 05/06/2013 03:50 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ivan,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 06. May 2013 at 14:58:55 +0200, Ivan Mincik wrote:
>>>
I wonder if ubuntugis PPA could be a recommended and onl
On 05/06/2013 07:40 AM, Ivan Mincik wrote:
On 05/06/2013 03:50 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Hi Ivan,
On Mon, 06. May 2013 at 14:58:55 +0200, Ivan Mincik wrote:
I wonder if ubuntugis PPA could be a recommended and only one repository
for QGIS 2.0 on Ubuntu instead of distribution packaged versi
On 05/06/2013 03:50 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> On Mon, 06. May 2013 at 14:58:55 +0200, Ivan Mincik wrote:
>> I wonder if ubuntugis PPA could be a recommended and only one repository
>> for QGIS 2.0 on Ubuntu instead of distribution packaged version and
>> package from 'http://qgis
Hi Ivan,
On Mon, 06. May 2013 at 14:58:55 +0200, Ivan Mincik wrote:
> I wonder if ubuntugis PPA could be a recommended and only one repository
> for QGIS 2.0 on Ubuntu instead of distribution packaged version and
> package from 'http://qgis.org/debian'.
Recommended: ok.
Only: why?
I don't see th
Hi,
I wonder if ubuntugis PPA could be a recommended and only one repository
for QGIS 2.0 on Ubuntu instead of distribution packaged version and
package from 'http://qgis.org/debian'. Reasons are following:
1. Currently there are many installation sources for the same Ubuntu
platform which is conf
