Hi Tim
+1 for going ahead with the release. It is one of the rare moments
without blockers now :-) .
Marco
Am 11.06.2012 12:54, schrieb Tim Sutton: > Hi All > > As many of you
have probably seen there are no blockers left in the > queue. Any
objects
Hi All
OK than we will stop accepting blockers for 1.8 and get on with it.
Regards
Tim
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Marco Hugentobler <
marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Tim
> +1 for going ahead with the release. It is one of the rare moments without
> bloc
Il 11/06/2012 14:54, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
> Hi All
>
> OK than we will stop accepting blockers for 1.8 and get on with it.
I think we should keep on accepting them: if it is possible we can always
(working in
master) issue a last minute fix, or schedule a bugfix release for later).
All the bes
Hi all,
I'd prefer to wait few days (e.g. 3 days) before releasing 1.8
to be sure the latest fixes haven't generated new issues.
After the 1.7.x series with a lot of problems just after the releases,
we should release a stable version of QGis.
Regards
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Paolo Cava
Hi
I will wait till tomorrow night and then go ahead and tag & branch if there
are no new blockers reported.
Regards
Tim
On Jun 11, 2012 5:47 PM, "Giuseppe Sucameli" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd prefer to wait few days (e.g. 3 days) before releasing 1.8
> to be sure the latest fixes haven't genera
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
> I will wait till tomorrow night and then go ahead and tag & branch if there
> are no new blockers reported.
100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 20
on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS x86_64
Congrats for the "make check" service ! :)
--strk;
Hi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
>
>> I will wait till tomorrow night and then go ahead and tag & branch if there
>> are no new blockers reported.
>
> 100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 20
>
> on Ubuntu
On 06/12/2012 01:44 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
I will wait till tomorrow night and then go ahead and tag& branch if there
are no new blockers reported.
100% tests passed, 0 tes
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:54:58PM +0200, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 01:44 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
> >Hi
> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
> >>
> >>>I will wait till tomorrow night and then go ahe
On 06/12/2012 02:11 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:54:58PM +0200, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
On 06/12/2012 01:44 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
I will wait ti
Hi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Marco Bernasocchi
wrote:
>>>
>>> what is the difference between make check and make tests?
>>
>> "make check" is for GNU afficionados [1].
>> "make test" is for those who like to be different.
>
> :) and qgis specific? since we have both :)
>
make test is pro
11 matches
Mail list logo
