Great -- seems like there's a consensus that 4.8 is the way to go.
I've made a pull request which bumps the minimum qt version to 4.8
here:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1006
I'll leave it to someone more senior to make the final call and merge this in.
Nyall
Hi Nyall,
On Tue, 12. Nov 2013 at 14:39:41 +1100, Nyall Dawson wrote:
What's the chance we can get the minimum qt version bumped up to 4.6?
Lucid which still isn't out of LTS has is - although that's probably not that
important.
But OSGeo4W 32bit has 4.7.1. So that would be the maximum
On 24 November 2013 21:50, Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de wrote:
But OSGeo4W 32bit has 4.7.1. So that would be the maximum version for me and
there's not much requiring 4.8 in current QGIS.
Ok - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/1007 sets the minimum version
to 4.7. Can we merge that and get the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 24/11/2013 11:50, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
But OSGeo4W 32bit has 4.7.1. So that would be the maximum version
for me and there's not much requiring 4.8 in current QGIS.
Hi Juergen,
wouldn't having two different versions, with possibly
Hello,
Le vendredi 15 novembre 2013 05:14:00, Martin Dobias a écrit :
[..]
It's probably reasonable to bump Qt version once per year, so in 2014 if
CentOS/Redhat 7 comes out I expect it will have something newer (4.7+)
I do not like the idea of being held back from upgrading minimal
I am also for jumping to 4.8. I think that people using RHEL would still
not install QGIS 2 until it settles down a little. Until than RHEL 7 will
come out. I think i should have been done when QGIS 2 development began.
Ivan Mincik
___
Qgis-developer
The repository for Fedora 18 includes QT 4.8.5
Ivan Minčík wrote:
I am also for jumping to 4.8. I think that people using RHEL would still
not install QGIS 2 until it settles down a little. Until than RHEL 7
will come out. I think i should have been done when QGIS 2 development
began.
..
+1 for going with 4.8 as minimum version.
Marco
On 15.11.2013 07:56, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 15/11/2013 05:14, Martin Dobias ha scritto:
I do not like the idea of being held back from upgrading minimal
requirements by one distribution. I think
On 11/13/2013 10:44 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 13/11/2013 22:22, Larry Shaffer ha scritto:
When this was last discussed [0] (over a year ago, and to no
conclusion), the lowest version for Qt, on a production platform
providing QGIS, was 4.5, but there were third-party updates for
those
Hi
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
I think the slow poke is actually likely to be CentOS/Redhat based
linux. This probably matters more for QGIS server but we do list desktop
packages for that family. Qt 4.6.x appears to be what's in the current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 15/11/2013 05:14, Martin Dobias ha scritto:
I do not like the idea of being held back from upgrading minimal
requirements by one distribution. I think it is fairly reasonable to
expect that only older software will work with older
+1 for 4.8 too
As mentioned in earlier posts .. old Qt might only be interesting
running on servers .. and people using server should be able to
configure them (meaning being able to install everything by themself
if they really want to use very old distributions)
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:56
+1 for 4.8 as the minimum version.
4.8 is on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS release.
Andreas
Am 2013-11-15 08:18, schrieb Werner Macho:
+1 for 4.8 too
As mentioned in earlier posts .. old Qt might only be interesting
running on servers .. and people using server should be able to
configure them (meaning
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Werner Macho werner.ma...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd rather take the step forward to 4.8 either .. even the stable
version of debian (which is usually behind everything) has QT4.8.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 13/11/2013 22:22, Larry Shaffer ha scritto:
When this was last discussed [0] (over a year ago, and to no
conclusion), the lowest version for Qt, on a production platform
providing QGIS, was 4.5, but there were third-party updates for
those
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Werner Macho werner.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd rather take the step forward to 4.8 either .. even the stable
version of debian (which is usually behind everything) has QT4.8.
Opinions?
For me +1 to set Qt 4.8 as a minimum for next release of QGIS Qt
4.8.0
What's the chance we can get the minimum qt version bumped up to 4.6?
There's a large number of issues relating to rotation of composer
items [1] which would be much easier to fix if I can use
QGraphicsItem::setRotation and QGraphicsItem::rotation, both of which
were introduced in 4.6.
Nyall
[1]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 12/11/2013 04:39, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
What's the chance we can get the minimum qt version bumped up to
4.6?
I'd be in favour of setting it to the minimum available in major OSs.
In Debian stable the standard is 4.8.2. What about Windows and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I think it depends on what is the oldest distribution we would like
to support ..
I guess that would be Ubuntu 10.04 lucid lynx - LTS .. which has
libqtcore4 (4.6.2) at the moment..
Dropping the support for lucid would bring us to Ubuntu 12:04
19 matches
Mail list logo
