> Not sure how far you got with the implementation, but for the record I
> would surely choose the solution 2. It is generally a good idea to
> keep core structures separated from Qt model - ideally the model
> should be acting just as an adapter to the core data structure. If we
> decide to change
Hi Borys
(sorry for the lag - I have been on holiday last week)
Not sure how far you got with the implementation, but for the record I
would surely choose the solution 2. It is generally a good idea to
keep core structures separated from Qt model - ideally the model
should be acting just as an ad
I need your advice which direction should we take to store plugin metadata in
QGIS 2.x. I started to work on Solution 2, but now I think maybe the first is
better? It looks much simpler anyway. I'd be happy to see some response asap,
as I'm going to implement it until lunch and go further today.
