On Aug 26, 2015 4:47 PM, "Bernd Vogelgesang"
wrote:
>
> Am 26.08.2015, 09:08 Uhr, schrieb Anita Graser :
> I reported this already some weeks ago: https://hub.qgis.org/issues/13174
> My suspicion was, that this is related to GDAL processes, cause all
others seem to run fine.
Thanks Bernd,
Must ha
Am 26.08.2015, 09:08 Uhr, schrieb Anita Graser :
Hi,
There seems to be a regression between Processing 2.9 and 2.10 where
2.10 fails to run models because it cannot find the >intermediate
results it produced in a previous step. The model runs perfectly in 2.9.
Bellow you can see an exampl
Hi Anita,
On Wed, 26. Aug 2015 at 09:08:23 +0200, Anita Graser wrote:
> :\Users\agraser\AppData\Local\Temp\processing\7f77fa47bcec4799818d1f5ea41cc8a9\OUTPUT.sh
> (without C: and .sh instead of .shp)
Sounds familiar - must have been reported somewhere else already - not sure if
I know it from a t
Hi,
There seems to be a regression between Processing 2.9 and 2.10 where 2.10
fails to run models because it cannot find the intermediate results it
produced in a previous step. The model runs perfectly in 2.9. Bellow you
can see an example to reproduce: just chain QGIS buffer and OGR dissolve
and
