On 28-09-16 15:12, René-Luc Dhont wrote:
> Hi Nyall,
>
> I like your proposition on QGIS Project and Layer Registry. Will you
> write a QEP about it ? Do you wait the grant vote ?
>
> About the server part, we used QgsMapLayerRegistry because some widgets
> rely on map layer ids and not map
Hi Nyall,
I like your proposition on QGIS Project and Layer Registry. Will you
write a QEP about it ? Do you wait the grant vote ?
About the server part, we used QgsMapLayerRegistry because some widgets
rely on map layer ids and not map layer pointers. We create our own
Project parser
Hi Devs,
To enhance the discussion, David Marteau @dmarteau, has updated the QEP:
QGIS Server Services as plugins like providers with Proposed solution.
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74
Feedback is welcomed.
René-Luc
Le 27/09/2016 à 09:19, Nyall Dawson a écrit :
Le 27/09/2016 à 09:33, Luca Manganelli a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:30 AM, René-Luc Dhont wrote:
This has been already fixed:
* firstly layer has been cached to avoid reloading it
* the layer description stored Extent and used it
Fixed in which QGIS version? We are
Hi Régis and Luca,
The other point, unique's id, is due to the fact that QGIS and QGIS
Server does not truth the QGIS Layer Description and verifying the
unicity of ids. So to avoid id, the layer has to be added with
'estimated metadata'.
If a PostGIS layer has not been opened with this
Le mardi 27 septembre 2016 à 09:25 +0200, Luca Manganelli a écrit :
> way in which qgis server does the same PostGis
> query (for extent or bounding box?) all times for each layer. It woud
> be useful to store these informations on the project file, to optimize
> times, with a configuration option
On 25 September 2016 at 18:06, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm glad that Matthias's semi-serious threats to remove the server from
> source tree and Nyall's complaints have shaken the souls of the server
> people!
Apologies if I've caused any offence here - I was
It sounds great. I agree that QGIS Server needs a dedicated effort and
coordination.
We (gis3w) will try to contribute. We are not C++ devs but we have summed a
significative experience with QGIS Servers's strengths and weeknesses. We
will partecipate to the discussions on the "high level" roadmap
Hi Alessandro,
I'm working with my colleague David on the QEP about new server
architecture.
Regards,
Le 25/09/2016 à 10:06, Alessandro Pasotti a écrit :
Hi,
I'm glad that Matthias's semi-serious threats to remove the server
from source tree and Nyall's complaints have shaken the souls of