On 09/07/2016 11:34 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 09/07/2016 11:26 AM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
>> I added internal python QtWebKit bindings in master_2 (as the C++ webkit as
>> still around).
>
> The WebKit support has so far only been removed from python-qt4 in
> Debian, but the C++ pack
Hi,
On Wed, 07. Sep 2016 at 11:26:34 +0200, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> Nightlies still underway, they should popup in stretch, sid and xenial today.
Dawn :)
stretch/i386 failed for some reason, but the others should be available now.
Jürgen
--
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH
Thanks x100, Juergen. I'll see if I can get some tests done - very much
appreciated. +1 for backporting, to fix a lot of broken plugins.
-
Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Qt4-Qt5-timeline-Qt4-s
Hi Matthias,
On Wed, 07. Sep 2016 at 11:40:14 +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> Thanks Jürgen!
> Should this be backported also to release-2_16?
Sure, but I'd wait for feedback (or the lack of any ;)) about the nighlies
first.
Jürgen
--
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49
Thanks Jürgen!
Should this be backported also to release-2_16?
Matthias
On 09/07/2016 11:26 AM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Sun, 10. May 2015 at 14:46:25 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
>> What about considering alternative packaging methods?
>
> I added internal python QtWebKit bindings
On 09/07/2016 11:26 AM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> I added internal python QtWebKit bindings in master_2 (as the C++ webkit as
> still around).
The WebKit support has so far only been removed from python-qt4 in
Debian, but the C++ packages (from qtwebkit) will also been removed
eventually. Most pr
Hi Tim,
On Sun, 10. May 2015 at 14:46:25 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
> What about considering alternative packaging methods?
I added internal python QtWebKit bindings in master_2 (as the C++ webkit as
still around).
Nightlies still underway, they should popup in stretch, sid and xenial today.
Jür
On 12/07/2015 07:42 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 02-05-15 10:19, Luigi Pirelli wrote:
>> http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com.es/2015/05/qt4s-status-and-qt4s-webkit-removal-in.html
>
> As reported in Debian Bug #784514 [0], the WebKit support will be
> removed from python-qt4 in earlier 2015 (b
While written by a gnome developer, this gives insights into the current
state of QtWebkit.
https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/02/01/on-webkit-security-updates/
As a reminder: Qt4->Qt5 transition and QtWebkit issues are only
partially linked.
Regards
--
Matthias Kuhn
OPENGIS.ch - https://
On 10-05-15 14:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 05/10/2015 02:16 PM, Anita Graser wrote:
>> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>>> Seems a rather serious issue. Shouldn't we reconsider our roadmap
>>> accordingly?
>>>
>>
>> I don't seem to be able to find any dates mentio
On 02-05-15 10:19, Luigi Pirelli wrote:
> http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com.es/2015/05/qt4s-status-and-qt4s-webkit-removal-in.html
As reported in Debian Bug #784514 [0], the WebKit support will be
removed from python-qt4 in earlier 2015 (but not before January 7th, one
month from now).
[0] https://b
On mobile devices we are already locked in a situation without QtWebkit
(Partiallly due to vendor policies I believe). So I would very much
enjoy to see the usage of it being kept to as little as possible.
For those interested in the current state, that's what's required to
compile QGIS 2.8 withou
On 05/10/2015 05:02 PM, Anita Graser wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> wrote:
>
>> On 05/10/2015 03:13 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
>> >
>> 2.8
>>> can't be maintained w/o Qt4, Python2 and PyQt4. But when stretch
>>> is released, support for 2.8 is long gone.
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
> On 05/10/2015 03:13 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> >
> 2.8
> > can't be maintained w/o Qt4, Python2 and PyQt4. But when stretch
> > is released, support for 2.8 is long gone.
> >
> > So I don't really see the urgency about this.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/10/2015 03:13 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> I would rather like to know what it actually takes to support
> Python3 and PyQt5. Did anyone try yet?
My trials ended with missing dependencies.
The changes for Qt5 are in the Debian GIS git repos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/10/2015 03:13 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> On Sun, 10. May 2015 at 14:48:14 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
>> My apologies I missed the part about a 2 year transition period
>> from Sebastiaan - which probably negates part of my message
>> above.
>
Hi Tim,
On Sun, 10. May 2015 at 14:48:14 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
> My apologies I missed the part about a 2 year transition period from
> Sebastiaan - which probably negates part of my message above.
Apparently a lot of people seem to miss that. We might loose unstable support
at some point ov
> On 10 May 2015, at 14:46, Tim Sutton wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> What about considering alternative packaging methods? For example making an
> equivalent of the windows standalone package for Linux. A long time ago I
> used to build QGIS and all its dependencies into a directory (e.g.
> /opt/qgis2.
Hi
What about considering alternative packaging methods? For example making an
equivalent of the windows standalone package for Linux. A long time ago I used
to build QGIS and all its dependencies into a directory (e.g. /opt/qgis2.8)
and then use a launcher script to update the library paths
On 05/10/2015 02:16 PM, Anita Graser wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> Seems a rather serious issue. Shouldn't we reconsider our roadmap
>> accordingly?
>>
>
> I don't seem to be able to find any dates mentioned in the linked
> resources. When (date) will Debian
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Paolo Cavallini
wrote:
> Seems a rather serious issue. Shouldn't we reconsider our roadmap
> accordingly?
>
I don't seem to be able to find any dates mentioned in the linked
resources. When (date) will Debian remove Qt4?
This basically warms up our discussion o
That's a pretty serious drawback. If there's no way around this, we need to
make sure composer labels are improved (and hopefully plug in the canvas
label drawing engine to the composer labels).
M
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Nyall Dawson
wrote:
> On 10 May 2015 at 18:51, Matthias Kuhn wro
Seems a rather serious issue. Shouldn't we reconsider our roadmap accordingly?
All the best.
Il 10 maggio 2015 11:25:23 CEST, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha
scritto:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA512
>
>On 05/10/2015 10:51 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 05/09/2015 03:28 PM, P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/10/2015 10:51 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 05/09/2015 03:28 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> Il 09/05/2015 12:38, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
>>
>>> How feasible is switching to Python 3?
>> I believe this would be a huge issue: mo
On 10 May 2015 at 18:51, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> The other issue is that there's a rather big dependency on QtWebkit
> currently. We are struggling already with that on Android.
> Alternatives
> * QtWebEngine is the future but only available starting from Qt 5.4. So
> this is not an option now.
>
Hi
On 05/09/2015 03:28 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 09/05/2015 12:38, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
>
>> How feasible is switching to Python 3?
> I believe this would be a huge issue: most or all plugins will not work,
> both the internal and the external ones, so our qgis will be badly lam
tank you for this analysis
regards, Luigi Pirelli
**
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Elance: https://www.elance.com/s/edit/luigipirelli/
* GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
* Sta
Il 09/05/2015 12:38, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
> How feasible is switching to Python 3?
I believe this would be a huge issue: most or all plugins will not work,
both the internal and the external ones, so our qgis will be badly lame.
Thanks for raising this point.
--
Paolo Cavallini - w
On 05/02/2015 10:19 AM, Luigi Pirelli wrote:
> basing of these info, timeline for transition is imposed by debian
> distribution
>
> http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com.es/2015/05/qt4s-status-and-qt4s-webkit-removal-in.html
Triggered by this announcement, a recent bugreport about the Qt4WebKit
remova
basing of these info, timeline for transition is imposed by debian distribution
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com.es/2015/05/qt4s-status-and-qt4s-webkit-removal-in.html
regards, Luigi Pirelli
**
* Linked
30 matches
Mail list logo
