[Qgis-developer] RoadGraphPlugin and network-analysis annonce

2011-09-28 Thread Сергей Якушев
Hello! In my fork QGIS in the branch network-analysis is a new version RoadGraphPlugin. Changes: 1. When the setting of "topological tolerance" value greater than zero in the construction of the graph is almost as fast as with a parameter equal to zero. 2. Reduced memory usage. If you are using

Re: [Qgis-developer] RoadGraphPlugin and network-analysis annonce

2011-09-28 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il giorno mer, 28/09/2011 alle 13.50 +0600, Сергей Якушев ha scritto: > Hello! > > In my fork QGIS in the branch network-analysis is a new version > RoadGraphPlugin. > > What do you think? I think this is a good candidate for inclusion in > the master-branch qgis. Thanks a lot Сергей! Any reas

Re: [Qgis-developer] RoadGraphPlugin and network-analysis annonce

2011-09-28 Thread Alexander Bruy
Hi Sergey, great work. +1 for merge this changes -- Alexander Bruy ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] RoadGraphPlugin and network-analysis annonce

2011-09-28 Thread maaza mekuria
Good work Sergey! Maaza --- On Wed, 9/28/11, Сергей Якушев wrote: > From: Сергей Якушев > Subject: [Qgis-developer] RoadGraphPlugin and network-analysis annonce > To: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > Date: Wednesday, September 28, 2011, 3:50 AM > Hello! > > In my fo

Re: [Qgis-developer] RoadGraphPlugin and network-analysis annonce

2011-09-30 Thread Sergey Yakushev
> Any reasons why we should not include it straight away? No. There is no particular reason. I think the code is stable enough for the master branch. -- С уважением Якушев Сергей yakush...@gmail.com ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.

Re: [Qgis-developer] RoadGraphPlugin and network-analysis annonce

2011-09-30 Thread Marco Hugentobler
Hi Sergey Pull request is merged. Thanks for your work! Regards, Marco Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 09.22:41 schrieb Sergey Yakushev: > > Any reasons why we should not include it straight away? > > No. There is no particular reason. I think the code is stable enough > for the master branch.