Yes, could someone please revert or solve this? I've been meeting this
issue since last summer (http://hub.qgis.org/issues/13117) and it
prevents some of my customers to upgrade from 2.8, missing all kinds of
nice new features.
Regards,
Raymond
On 25-10-15 22:19, Jeremy Palmer wrote:
The WFS client should really get some love by a developer (and our
funds). Currently, it is broken and does not support the newer WFS version.
Hopefully, we can fund something from our donations/sponsorships.
Andreas
On 27.10.2015 09:24, Raymond Nijssen wrote:
Yes, could someone please revert
Hi Andreas,
That would be great, but for now I'd like to have the change that broke
this reverted.
Raymond
On 27-10-15 10:50, Andreas Neumann wrote:
The WFS client should really get some love by a developer (and our
funds). Currently, it is broken and does not support the newer WFS version.
> Should we maybe 'rename' the 'caching' option to be an option which
> makes QGIS resend a feature request every zoom/pan?
I agree we should revert to the old behaviour and rename the label.
This change has now broken a major use case for users of large WFS datasets.
Cheers
Jeremy
This
Hi devs,
Looking at this commit:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/e4e4839823fad1b980cb815889c18edb9c4352b7
it looks like there there was a checkbox introduced which forces the WFS
provider to add a bbox to the requests.
but this was already working via the 'cached' option.
Currently for
